Diagnostic biomarker

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Jump to: navigation, search

A diagnostic biomarker refers to a biological parameter that aids the diagnosis of a disease and may serve in determining disease progression and/or success of treatment. It may be a laboratory, radiological, genetic, anatomical, physiological or other finding that helps to differentiate one disease from others. In 2001, the World Health Organization (WHO), in coordination with the United Nations and the International Labor Organization, has defined a biomarker as “any substance, structure, or process that can be measured in the body or its products and influence or predict the incidence of outcome or disease.”[1] The Biomarkers Consortium, a major public-private biomedical research partnership, uses the 2001 National Institutes of Health Biomarkers Definitions Working Group definition: "Biomarkers are characteristics that are objectively measured and evaluated as indicators of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacologic responses to therapeutic intervention."[2]

Presently, myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) patients are diagnosed based on well-defined clinical criteria, for example, please see the Proposed Diagnostic Criteria Chart section of the Institute of Medicine report. Diagnosis also includes a process of exclusion of other causes of fatigue which can result in a delay of diagnosis.[3]

Potential diagnostic biomarkers for ME/CFS are being explored by many researchers in the field. Below is a list of some that have been considered. They are alphabetically ordered so as not to imply some may be more promising than others.

Activin B[edit]

A 2017 study that used the Canadian Consensus Criteria concludes: "Elevated activin B levels together with normal activin A levels identified patients with the diagnostic symptoms of CFS/ME, thus providing a novel serum based test. The activins have multiple physiological roles and capture the diverse array of symptoms experienced by CFS/ME patients."[4]

Allantoin[edit]

A 2015 metabolic profiling study of female ME/CFS subjects by Armstrong, et al, showed an increase in allantoin in the urine collected as a first-void urine sample, i.e., collected upon arising. Allantoin has been considered a reliable indicator of exercise-induced oxidative stress in humans. Other studies have shown indications of oxidative stress in ME/CFS[5] "but this is the first to report of allantoin as a marker and the first to suggest a pathway linking ATP degradation and oxidative stress."[6]

Obstacle for use: The findings in this published study need to be validated through replication by other studies using a more heterogeneous ME/CFS population.

Brain imaging[edit]

Using advanced brain imaging, Zeineh, et.al., found that there was right arcuate fasciculus (FA) abnormality in CFS patients. "Bilateral white matter atrophy is present in CFS...Right hemispheric increased FA may reflect degeneration of crossing fibers or strengthening of short-range fibers. Right anterior arcuate FA may serve as a biomarker for CFS."[7]

Obstacle for use: The specialized radiological equipment needed for this test is usually only available in facilities engaged in research.

CellTrend diagnostic test[edit]

Cell-Trend bases its test on the theory that a subset of 20-30% of all patients suffering from ME/CFS have developed elevated levels of three auto-antibodies, i.e., auto-antibodies against the b2-adrenergic receptor, auto-antibodies against the muscarinic cholinergic receptor 3 (M3) and auto-antibodies against the muscarinic cholinergic receptor 4 (M4).[8][9]

Obstacle for use: Only detects a subset 20-30%. Not widely accepted. Patients pay the test cost.

Combination of M-wave, TBars, and CD26[edit]

A 2016 study in France by Fenouillet, et al, examined 36 ME/CFS cases and 11 healthy controls with regard to three biological variables: a) post-exercise M-wave - a measurement after electrical stimulation of muscle nerves which coordinates with muscle fatigue b) TBARS variations - a plasma marker which represents excessive oxidative stress response to exercise, and c) CD26-expression at rest - a protein potentially related to inflammation, which was found to decrease in CFS patients. Although the researchers set out to explore physiological and biological abnormalities that could be indicative of the etiology, "striking differences" in the results between patients and controls lead them to believe that this combination could be used to identify patients with ME/CFS and help to distinguish ME/CFS patients from fibromyalgia patients.[10]

Obstacle for use: The findings in this published study need to be validated through replication by other studies.

Cytokine expression[edit]

Several researchers are exploring if cytokine expression in ME/CFS is a unique enough signature to be used as a diagnostic marker.[11][12][13]

Cytokine expression changes in ME/CFS related to length of illness, with some cytokines levels increasing and some decreasing dependent on illness duration. Russell, et al, focused on a subset of three cytokines, IL-1α, 6 and 8, in plasma samples and concluded that: "Setting these 3 markers as a triple screen and adjusting their contribution according to illness duration [the] sub-groups produced ME/CFS classification accuracies of 75–88%."[11]

Obstacle for use: Since cytokine expression changes in ME/CFS related to progression of the illness, the validity of potentially useful markers may be obscured by such variation.[11]

In 2016, Landi, et al, "observed highly significant reductions in the concentration of circulating interleukin (IL)-16, IL-7, and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor A (VEGF-A) in ME/CFS patients" but not in patients of other chronic illnesses with fatigue as a symptom. This three cytokine pattern is being studied further as a potential biomarker for ME/CFS.[14]

Dysfunction of TCA and urea cycles[edit]

A 2016 study in Japan, by Yamano, et al, looked at the differences in intermediate metabolite concentrations in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) and urea cycles in CFS patients versus healthy controls: "CFS patients exhibited significant differences in intermediate metabolite concentrations in the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) and urea cycles. The combination of ornithine/citrulline and pyruvate/isocitrate ratios discriminated CFS patients from healthy controls, yielding area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.801 (95% confidential interval [CI]: 0.711–0.890, P < 0.0001) and 0.750 (95% CI: 0.584–0.916, P = 0.0069) for training (n = 93) and validation (n = 40) datasets, respectively. These findings provide compelling evidence that a clinical diagnostic tool could be developed for CFS based on the ratios of metabolites in plasma."[15]

Obstacle for use: The specialized laboratory equipment needed for this test is usually only available in facilities engaged in research. The findings in this published study need to be validated through replication by other studies.

EBV-encoded DNA polymerase and EBV-encoded dUTPase[edit]

In 2012, Dr Ronald Glaser and Dr A Martin Lerner, et al, discovered that the proteins, Epstein-Barr virus-encoded DNA polymerase and Epstein-Barr virus-encoded dUTPase, were present in the blood sera of an EBV subset of CFS patients, but was negative in sera of controls.[16]

Obstacle for use: These were preliminary findings that need to be are corroborated by studies with a larger number of EBV subset CFS patients.

Electrical Impedance[edit]

Experimentation is also being carried out at the End ME/CFS Project with the Open Medicine Foundation to test if a metabolic testing device using new nanofabricated technology that measures electrical impedance could be used to develop a simple diagnostic test for myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS). Blood from patients with ME/CFS causes a rapid and significant rise in electrical impedance when placed in this device, whereas blood from healthy people does not. The device is inexpensive and gives a real-time assay. This nanofabricated technology has the potential to be place in a hand-held device and disseminate to physician's offices for use as a test during medical visits.[17]

Obstacle for use: The technology is still very new and needs further testing. If the technology works, development into an inexpensive, easily disseminated, handheld device is necessary.

Gut microbiome[edit]

In a 2016 study done by Giloteaux, Hanson, et al, the gut bacterial microbiome of 48 ME/CFS patients and 39 healthy controls was examined by sequencing regions of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid (rRNA) genes that allow identification of the different types of bacteria present in the stool as well as inflammatory markers from serum. "Bacterial diversity was decreased in the ME/CFS specimens compared to controls, in particular, a reduction in the relative abundance and diversity of members belonging to the Firmicutes phylum...Using a machine learning approach trained on the data obtained from 16S rRNA and inflammatory markers, individuals were classified correctly as ME/CFS with a cross-validation accuracy of 82.93%."[18]

Immunosignatures[edit]

Immunosignaturing is a medical diagnostic test which uses arrays of random-sequence peptides (i.e., linked amino acids) to measure specific antibodies circulating in the blood. The Nevada Center for Biomedical Research in Reno, Nevada, USA has identified a unique Immunosignature (IMS) comprised of a subset of 25 peptides that differentiates the blood serum from people with ME compared to controls with 92.9% specificity and 97.6% sensitivity. ME patients met both the ICC and Fukuda criteria.[19]

Metabolomics[edit]

Naviaux, et al, at the University of California, San Diego School of Medicine reported in 2016 "that targeted, broad-spectrum metabolomics of plasma not only revealed a characteristic chemical signature but also revealed an unexpected underlying biology." The researchers found that Chronic Fatigue Syndrome patients had an average of 40 metabolic abnormalities. From these, a set of 8 metabolites were identified in male patients and a set of 13 metabolites in females that performed well together as a diagnostic test. Both sets gave a 95% Confidence Interval. The eight metabolites selected for males were phosphatidyl choline PC(16:0/16:0), glucosylceramide GC(18:1/16:0), 1-P5C, FAD, pyroglutamic acid (also known as 5-oxoproline), 2-hydroxyisocaproic acid (HICA), l-serine, and lathosterol. The 13 metabolites selected for females were THC(18:1/24:0), phosphatidyl choline PC(16:0/16:0), hydroxyproline, ceramide(d18:1/22:2), lathosterol, adenosine, phosphatidylinositol PI(16:0/16:0), FAD, 2-octenoylcarnitine, phosphatidyl choline plasmalogen PC(22:6/P18:0), phosphatidyl choline PC(18:1/22:6), 1-P5C, and CDCA. There are several metabolites that appear on both the males and female lists.[20]

Obstacle for use: The specialized laboratory equipment needed for this test is usually only available in facilities engaged in research.

MicroRNA (miRNA)[edit]

Very simply stated, microRNA (miRNA) are molecules involved in gene expression. They are different from mRNA which stands for messenger RNA. A 2016 study by Petty, et al found that "four upregulated miRNA were suitable markers to resolve CFS/ME subjects from a matched control cohort."[21] A 2012 study by Brenu, et al found the expression of eight specific miRNAs "significantly decreased in NK cells of CFS/ME patients in comparison to the non-fatigued controls" and one specific miRNA was significantly downregulated in "both the NK and CD8(+)T cells in the CFS/ME sufferers."[22]

In 2015, Griffith University filed for a patent for a biological marker (Patent Publication number WO2016023077 A1) for the diagnosis and management of ME and CFS. Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik and Ekua Brenu are listed as the inventors. The patent application states: "The present invention resides broadly in the use of at least one miRNA as a biological marker for identifying or diagnosing a subject having CFS and/or ME."[23] In 2016, Griffith University's Professor Donald Staines and Professor Sonya Marshall-Gradisnik announced that they have been awarded a $4-million grant to be administered during the next five years that will enable them to continue research into developing a diagnostic test for ME/CFS.[24]

Obstacle for use: Although the science of using the detection of different miRNAs for disease confirmation is exploding, it is still in its infancy. There are no established baseline data for miRNAs among normal individuals which would be necessary for using miRNA levels as biomarkers.[25] The findings in the study published in March 2016 need to be validated through replication by other studies. The Griffith University test has not been released for public use to date.

Natural killer cell function[edit]

Numerous studies of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome have found evidence of reduced natural killer cell function.[26][27][28][29][30] Some studies have showed natural killer cell function correlates with illness severity.[31] One study found increased differentiation in NK cells.[32]

Obstacles for use: Specialized lab equipment not available in average laboratories; blood specimen must be tested within 48 hours of draw and must remain at between 59°-98.6°F or 15°-37°C[33] so special considerations are needed in transporting blood specimens to specialized labs.

Orosomucoid[edit]

Orosomucoid (ORM) is a protein which has many biological activities including modulating immunity. In 2016, a study with Yang, et al, showed that the serum level of ORM in individuals with chronic fatigue syndrome was consistently elevated compared with that from healthy volunteers. The serum cortisol level in these same CFS patients was moderately decreased, indicating that "ORM increase is not a direct result of stress response."[34]

Orosomucoid 2 is one of the proteins Baraniuk, et al, found in a unique CFS – related proteome when studying pooled cerebrospinal fluid of CFS patients.[35]

Obstacles in use: Further testing needed for confirmation.

Plasma neuropeptide Y[edit]

Plasma levels of neuropeptide Y (NPY), a neurotransmitter in high quantity in the brain, are reported to be elevated in complex multi-symptom illnesses associated with immunologic dysfunction. Fletcher, et al, did a study believed to be "the first in the CFS literature to report that plasma NPY is elevated [in ME/CFS] compared to healthy controls and to a fatigued comparison group, GWI [Gulf War Illness] patients. The significant correlations of NPY with stress, negative mood, general health, depression and cognitive function strongly suggest that this peptide be considered as a biomarker to distinguish subsets of CFS."[36]

Obstacles in use: NPY is elevated in other immune illnesses such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). NPY varies greatly between individuals and is interdependent on other cellular and molecular components and must be viewed with data from other biomarkers.[36]

Proteome in cerebrospinal fluid[edit]

Analysis of the proteome (complement of proteins) in cerebrospinal fluid specimens by Baraniuk, et al, in 2005, showed one, consistent CFS-related proteome compared to a group with Gulf War Illness and to controls. They found the presence of 10 proteins in cerebrospinal fluid that were shared by patients with CFS, but were not detected in control samples."[35]

A similar study of proteome analysis of cerebrospinal fluid was done in 2011 by Schutzer, et al. His group compared the pooled cerebrospinal fluid specimens of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome to patients with Neurologic Post Treatment Lyme disease (nPTLS) and to healthy controls. The cerebrospinal fluid proteome of the three groups were markedly unique for each group. Although nPTLS and CFS have similar clinical presentations, the researchers were able to distinguish the two syndromes from each other via data analysis.[37]

Obstacles in use: The specialized laboratory equipment needed for this test is usually only available in facilities engaged in research. The samples were pooled specimens. The presence of these proteins in one patient may be too small for average laboratory equipment to detect. Specific proteins to be used for a biomarker have not been identified.

Saliva proteins ACON and ATPB[edit]

Using whole saliva, Ciregia, et al, 2016, found two proteins, aconitate hydratase (ACON) and ATP synthase subunit beta (ATPB), were upregulated in CFS. When these two proteins were tested in combination, they gave a ROC curve with sensitivity of 93% and specificity of 70%, in a twin study where one twin was healthy and one had CFS. A second cohort of unrelated CFS patients and healthy controls, likewise proved ACON and ATPB as promising biomarkers.[38]

Short QT interval[edit]

"Automated measurement of QTc [QT corrected] in clinical practise has potential utility as a diagnostic biomarker in CFS."[39]

The electrocardiographic QT interval is shorter in patients with ME/CFS than those of the general population.[39] The only exception is in those who have a rare genetic illness, Short QT syndrome. Differentiation is easy to determine because those with Short QT syndrome also have tall and peaked T waves,[40] whereas the T waves are normal in PwME. Modern computer-based ECG machines are programed to correct the QT interval in relation to heart rate, because a number of medical conditions illicit a prolonged QT interval.[41]

Obstacles for use: medical personnel education needed to recognize this finding on the EKG finding as indicative of ME/CFS; modern computer-based EKG machine needed.

Two-day cardiopulmonary exercise testing[edit]

Two-day cardiopulmonary exercise testing or 2-day CPET is an accepted, reliable test for post-exertional malaise (PEM), one of the cardinal symptoms that distinguishes between individuals with and without ME/CFS.[42]

Obstacles for use: The 2-day CPET "carries substantial risk for these patients as it may worsen their condition."[3] A single day CPET is a common test used as a cardiac stress test and therefore the equipment is widely available at medical centers, however, medical personnel would need to be educated on how to interpret a 2-day CPET test for ME/CFS diagnosis.

Others[edit]

Other biomarkers being researched:

  • Dr. Kevin Conley and Dr. David Maughan, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA are studying the abnormal response of the muscle metabolites, NADP+/NADPH, as a molecular marker in ME/CFS patients before and after fatiguing exercise by using advanced, non-invasive magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS).[43]
  • Dr. Isabel Barao hypothesizes that FcR (a protein found on the surface of certain cells) dysfunction in immune cells is a risk factor for the development of ME/CFS. The Bateman Horne Center, the National Cancer Institute (NCI) at NIH, and Roche Pharmaceuticals, are examining polymorphisms and mutations of FcgRs in NK cells of ME/CFS patients and their associations to antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) capability and disease pathology.[44]
  • the presence of salivary Human herpesvirus 6 (HHV6) and Human herpesvirus 7 (HHV7) biomarkers to distinguish physiological fatigue from pathological fatigue[45]
  • visible and near-infrared (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy of patients' thumbs are being explored in Japan as a non-invasive test for CFS[46][47]
  • Dr. David Kaufman of the Open Medicine Institute reports diagnostic markers for ME/CFS include low natural killer cell function, low vasopressin levels, mutations of the MTHFR gene, and abnormalities of the HPA axis.[48] See Arginine vasopressin

Learn more[edit]

References[edit]

  1. World Health Organization (2001), Biomarkers in Risk Assessment: Validity and Validation. (report) 
  2. Biomarkers Definitions Working Group (2001), "Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: Preferred definitions and conceptual framework", Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 200 (69): 89–95, doi:10.1067/mcp.2001.113989 
  3. 3.0 3.1 Institute of Medicine (USA); Committee on the Diagnostic Criteria for Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (10 February 2015), Beyond Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Redefining an Illness 
  4. Lidbury, Brett; Badia, Kita; Lewis, Donald; Hayward, Susan; Ludlow, Helen; Hedger, Mark; de Kretser, David (2017), "Activin B is a novel biomarker for chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME) diagnosis: a cross sectional study", Journal of Translational Medicine, doi:10.1186/s12967-017-1161-4 
  5. Morris, Gerwyn; Maes, Michael (2014), "Oxidative and Nitrosative Stress and Immune-Inflammatory Pathways in Patients with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)", Current Neuropharmacology, 12 (2): 168–185, doi:10.2174/1570159X11666131120224653 
  6. Armstrong, Christopher W.; McGregor, Neil R.; Lewis, Donald P.; Butt, Henry L.; Gooley, Paul R. (2015), "Metabolic profiling reveals anomalous energy metabolism and oxidative stress pathways in chronic fatigue syndrome patients", Metabolomics, 11 (6): 1626–1639, doi:10.1007/s11306-015-0816-5 
  7. Zeineh, Michael M.; Kang, James; Atlas, Scott W.; Raman, Mira M.; Reiss, Allan L.; Norris, Jane L.; Valencia, Ian; Montoya, Jose G. (Feb 2015), "Right Arcuate Fasciculus Abnormality in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome" (PDF), Radiology, 274 (2): 517-526, doi:10.1148/radiol.14141079 
  8. http://www.celltrend.de/cfs-diagnostics.html
  9. Loebel, M; Grabowski, P; Heidecke, H; Bauer, S; Hanitsch, LG; Wittke, K; Meisel, C; Reinke, P; Volk, H; Fluge, Ø; Mella, O; Scheibenbogen, C (2016), "Antibodies to β adrenergic and muscarinic cholinergic receptors in patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome", Brain, behavior, and immunity, 52: 32-39, doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2015.09.013 
  10. Fenouillet, E.; Vigouroux, A.; Steinberg, J. G.; Chagvardieff, A.; Retornaz, F.; Guieu, R.; Jammes, Y. (2016), "Association of biomarkers with health-related quality of life and history of stressors in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome patients", Journal of Translational Medicine, 14 (1): 251, PMID 27580693, doi:10.1186/s12967-016-1010-x 
  11. 11.0 11.1 11.2 Russell, Lindsey; Broderick, Gordon; Taylor, Renee; Fernandes, Henrique; Harvey, Jeanna; Barnes, Zachary; Smylie, AnneLiese; Collado, Fanny; Balbin, Elizabeth; Katz, Ben; Klimas, Nancy; Fletcher, Mary Ann (2016), "Illness progression in chronic fatigue syndrome: a shifting immune baseline", BMC Immunology, 17 (3), doi:10.1186/s12865-016-0142-3 
  12. Peterson, D; Brenu, EW; Gottschalk, G; Ramos, Sandra B; Nguyen, T; Staines, D; Marshall-Gradisnik, S (2015), "Cytokines in the Cerebrospinal Fluids of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis", Mediators of Inflammation, 2015, doi:10.1155/2015/929720 
  13. Hornig, M; Gottschalk, G; Peterson, D; Knox, KK; Schultz, AF; Eddy, ML; Che, X; Lipkin, WI (2016), "Cytokine network analysis of cerebrospinal fluid in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.", Molecular Psychiatry, 21 (2): 261-9, doi:10.1038/mp.2015.29 
  14. Landi, Abdolamir; Broadhurst, David; Vernon, Suzanne D; Tyrrell, D. Lorne J.; Houghton, Michael (2016), "Reductions in circulating levels of IL-16, IL-7 and VEGF-A in myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome", Cytokine, 78: 27-36, PMID 26615570, doi:10.1016/j.cyto.2015.11.018 
  15. Yamano, Emi; Sugimoto, Masahiro; Hirayama, Akiyoshi; Kume, Satoshi; Yamato, Masanori; Jin, Guanghua; Tajima, Seiki; Goda, Nobuhito; Iwai, Kazuhiro; Fukuda, Sanae; Yamaguti, Kouzi; Kuratsune, Hirohiko; Soga, Tomoyoshi; Watanabe, Yasuyoshi; Kataoka, Yosky (2016), "Index markers of chronic fatigue syndrome with dysfunction of TCA and urea cycles", Scientific Reports, 6 (34990), PMID 27725700, doi:10.1038/srep34990 
  16. Lerner, AM; Ariza, ME; Williams, M; Jason, L; Beqaj, S; Fitzgerald, JT; Lemeshow, S; Glaser, R (2012), "Antibody to Epstein-Barr Virus Deoxyuridine Triphosphate Nucleotidohydrolase and Deoxyribonucleotide Polymerase in a Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Subset", PLoS ONE, 7 (11): e47891, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047891 
  17. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sGBXXlQO49g
  18. Giloteaux, L.; Goodrich, J. K.; Walters, W. A.; Levine, S. M.; Ley, R.; Hanson, M. R. (2016), "Reduced diversity and altered composition of the gut microbiome in individuals with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.", Microbiome, 4 (1): 30, PMID 27338587, doi:10.1186/s40168-016-0171-4 
  19. Singh, Sahajpreet; Stafford, Phillip; Schlauch, Karen A.; Tillett, Richard R.; Gollery, Martin; Johnston, Stephen Albert; Khaiboullina, Svetlana F.; De Meirleir, Kenny L.; Rawat, Shanti; Mijatovic, Tatjana; Subramanian, Krishnamurthy; Palotás, András; Lombardi, Vincent C. (2016), "Humoral Immunity Profiling of Subjects with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis Using a Random Peptide Microarray Differentiates Cases from Controls with High Specificity and Sensitivity", Molecular Neurobiology, doi:10.1007/s12035-016-0334-0 
  20. Naviaux, Robert K; Naviaux, Jane C.; Lia, Kefeng; Bright, A. Taylor; Alaynicka, William A.; Wang, Lin; Baxter, Asha; Nathan, Neil; Anderson, Wayne; Gordon, Eric (2016), "Metabolic features of chronic fatigue syndrome", PNAS, 113 (37), doi:10.1073/pnas.1607571113 
  21. Petty, Robert D.; McCarthy, Neil E.; Le Dieu, Rifca; Kerr, Jonathan R. (11 March 2016), "MicroRNAs hsa-miR-99b, hsa-miR-330, hsa-miR-126 and hsa-miR-30c: Potential Diagnostic Biomarkers in Natural Killer (NK) Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)/ Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME)", PLOS ONE, PMID 26967895, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0150904 
  22. Brenu, Ekua W; Ashton, KJ; van Driel, M; Staines, Donald; Peterson, Daniel; Atkinson, GM; Marshall-Gradisnik, Sonya (2012), "Cytotoxic lymphocyte microRNAs as prospective biomarkers for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis.", Journal of Affective Disorders, 141 (2-3): 261-9, doi:10.1016/j.jad.2012.03.037 
  23. https://www.google.co.uk/patents/WO2016023077A1?cl=en&dq=sonya+marshall-gradisnik
  24. http://www.goldcoastbulletin.com.au/lifestyle/gold-coast-team-getting-closer-to-discovering-test-for-chronic-fatigue-syndrom/news-story/1627b3fcc41c53efac927200a53cc756
  25. Tonge, D. P.; Gant, T. W. (2016), "What is normal? Next generation sequencing-driven analysis of the human circulating miRNAOme", BMC Molecular Biology, 17 (4), doi:10.1186/s12867-016-0057-9 
  26. Barker, Edward; Fujimura, Sue F.; Fadem, Mitchell B; Landay, Alan L.; Levy, Jay A. (1994), "Immunologic Abnormalities Associated with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome", Clin Infect Dis., 18 (Supplement 1): S136-S141, doi:10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S136 
  27. Whiteside, TL; Friberg, D (1998), "Natural killer cells and natural killer cell activity in chronic fatigue syndrome.", Am J Med, 105 (3A): 27S–34S, PMID 9790479 
  28. Brenu, EW; Huth, TK; Hardcastle, SL; Fuller, K; Kaur, M; Johnston, S; Ramos, Sandra; Staines, Donald; Marshall-Gradisnik, Sonya (2014), "Role of adaptive and innate immune cells in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis", Int Immunol, 26 (4): 233-42, PMID 24343819, doi:10.1093/intimm/dxt068 
  29. Fletcher, Mary Ann; Maher, Kevin J; Klimas, Nancy (April 2002), "Natural killer cell function in chronic fatigue syndrome", Clinical and Applied Immunology Reviews, 2 (2): 129–139, doi:10.1016/S1529-1049(01)00047-2 
  30. Brenu, Ekua W; van Driel, Mieke L; Staines, Donald R; Ashton, Kevin J; Hardcastle, Sharni L; Keane, James; Tajouri, Lotti; Peterson, Daniel; Ramos, Sandra B; Marshall-Gradisnik, Sonya M (2012), "Longitudinal investigation of natural killer cells and cytokines in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis", Journal of Translational Medicine, 10: 88, doi:10.1186/1479-5876-10-88 
  31. Ojo-Amaize, Emmanuel A.; Conley, Edward J.; Peter, James B. (1994), "Decreased Natural Killer Cell Activity Is Associated with Severity of Chronic Fatigue Immune Dysfunction Syndrome", Clin Infect Dis., 18 (Supplement 1): S157-S159., doi:10.1093/clinids/18.Supplement_1.S157 
  32. Huth, TK; Brenu, EW; Ramos, S; Nguyen, T; Broadley, S; Staines, D; Marshall-Gradisnik, S (Jan 2016), "Pilot Study of Natural Killer Cells in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Multiple Sclerosis", Scand J Immunol, 83(1): 44-51, PMID 26381393, doi:10.1111/sji.12388 
  33. http://www.questdiagnostics.com/testcenter/BUOrderInfo.action?tc=34184X&labCode=QDV
  34. Yang, Sun; Zhen-Xian, Zhang; Liu, Xia (2016), "Orosomucoid (ORM) as a Potential Biomarker for the Diagnosis of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (CFS)", CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics, 22 (3): 251–252, doi:10.1111/cns.12522 
  35. 35.0 35.1 Baraniuk, J.B.; Casado, B.; Maibach, H.; Clauw, D.H.; Pannell, L.K.; Hess, S.A. (2005), "Chronic fatigue syndrome – related proteome in human cerebrospinal fluid", BMC Neurology, 5 (22), doi:10.1186/1471-2377-5-22 
  36. 36.0 36.1 Fletcher, Mary Ann; Rosenthal, Martin; Antoni, Michael; Ironson, Gail; Zeng, Xiao R; Barnes, Zachary; Harvey, Jeanna M; Hurwitz, Barry; Levis, Silvina; Broderick, Gordon; Klimas, Nancy G (2010), "Plasma neuropeptide Y: a biomarker for symptom severity in chronic fatigue syndrome", Behavioral and Brain Functions, 6 (76), doi:10.1186/1744-9081-6-76 
  37. Schutzer, Steven E; Angel, Thomas E.; Liu, Tao; Schepmoes, Athena A.; Clauss, Therese R.; Adkins, Joshua N.; Camp, David G.; Holland, Bart K.; Bergquist, Jonas; Coyle, Patricia K.; Smith, Richard D.; Fallon, Brian A.; Natelson, Benjamin (2011), "Distinct Cerebrospinal Fluid Proteomes Differentiate Post-Treatment Lyme Disease from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome", PLoS ONE, 6 (2), doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017287 
  38. Ciregia, F; Kollipara, L; Giusti1, L; Zahedi, R P; Giacomelli, C; Mazzoni, M R; Giannaccini, G; Scarpellini, P; Urbani, A; Sickmann, A; Lucacchini, A; Bazzichi, L (2016), "Bottom-up proteomics suggests an association between differential expression of mitochondrial proteins and chronic fatigue syndrome", Translational Psychiatry, 6 (9): e904, doi:10.1038/tp.2016.184 
  39. 39.0 39.1 Scott, Ashley; Norton, Michael; Mabillard, Holly; Newton, Julia (2012), "Shortened QTc interval in chronic fatigue syndrome" (PDF), Bulletin of IACFS/ME, 19 (3/4): 202-211 
  40. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Short_QT_syndrome
  41. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QT_interval
  42. Davenport, TE; Stevens, SR; Baroni, K; Van Ness, M; Snell, CR (2011), "Diagnostic accuracy of symptoms characterising chronic fatigue syndrome.", Disability and Rehabilitation, 33 (19-20): 1768-75, doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.546936 
  43. http://solvecfs.org/promising-non-invasive-diagnostic-testing-project-seeks-to-detect-mecfs/
  44. https://batemanhornecenter.org/uncovering-biomarkers-fcg-receptors/
  45. Aoki, R; Kobayashi, N; Suzuki, G; Kuratsune, H; Shimada, K; Oka, N; Takahashi, M; Yamadera, W; Iwashita, M; Tokuno, S; Nibuya, M; Tanichi, M; Mukai, Y; Mitani, K; Kondo, K; Ito, H; Nakayama, K (2016), "Human herpesvirus 6 and 7 are biomarkers for fatigue, which distinguish between physiological fatigue and pathological fatigue", Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 478 (1): 424-30, PMID 27396623, doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2016.07.010 
  46. Sakudo, A. (2016), "Potential use of visible and near-infrared spectroscopy for the analysis and diagnosis of chronic fatigue syndrome (Review)", Molecular Medicine Reports, 14 (3): 1875-1879, doi:10.3892/mmr.2016.5476 
  47. Sakudo, A.; Kuratsune, H.; Kato, YH.; Ikuta, K. (2012), "Visible and near-infrared spectra collected from the thumbs of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome for diagnosis.", Clinica Chimica Acta, 413 (19-20): 1629-32, PMID 22583968, doi:10.1016/j.cca.2012.05.004 
  48. http://www.nytimes.com/2015/02/25/opinion/understanding-chronic-fatigue.html?_r=2&mtrref=me-pedia.org&gwh=F909C83D32EF0E6D1503C5DB7774D4A9&gwt=pay&assetType=opinion
  49. Fischer, David B.; William, Arsani H.; Strauss, Adam C.; Unger, Elizabeth R.; Jason, Leonard; Marshall, Jr, Gailen D.; Dimitrakoff, Jordan D. (2014), "Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: The Current Status and Future Potentials of Emerging Biomarkers", Fatigue: Biomedicine, Health & Behavior, 2 (2): 93-109, doi:10.1080/21641846.2014.906066 
  50. Klimas, NG; Broderick, G; Fletcher, MA (2012), "Biomarkers for chronic fatigue.", Brain Behav Immun, 26 (8): 1202-10, PMID 22732129, doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2012.06.006 


The information provided at this site is not intended to diagnose or treat any illness.

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history