Template talk:Cleanup

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Jump to: navigation, search

Calling from other templates[new][edit source][reply]

check via a page name: DMC, DMCA, Category handler, mbox?

Translation work: System messages[new][edit source][reply]

Translations are needed for languages:

de, es, fr, nl, ar, da, fi, it, ja, no, pl, pt, ru, sv, vi, zh-hant, zh-hans

  • vi has no pagetriage messages of those needed


content hidden
MediaWiki:No-reason: (talk)
MediaWiki:Moodbar-action-reason-required: (talk)

  • Pagetriage
    • Many

Exports from translatewiki special export[new][edit source][reply]

ar, da, fi, it, ja, no, pl, pt, ru, sv, vi, zh-hant, zh-hans

lqt as No-reason only

MediaWiki:Mobile-frontend-photo-upload: (talk)

MediaWiki:pagetriage-tags-citationstyle-desc: (talk)

mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-cleanupreorganise-desc/ar mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-condense-label/ar mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-copyedit-desc/ar mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-disputed-desc/ar mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-externallinks-desc/ar mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-nonfree-desc/ar mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-pov-desc/ar mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-refimprove-desc/ar mediawiki:/arpagetriage-tags-stub-label/ar mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-technical-desc/ar mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-unbalanced-desc/ar Mediawiki:pagetriage-tags-verylong-desc/ar


Translations done[new][edit source][reply]

Done many of

Many custom messages to do

content hidden
content hidden

Cleanup message[new][edit source][reply]

Citations needed - done[new][edit source][reply]

Text templates used - done[new][edit source][reply]

Template:Cleanup reason text (done)[new][edit source][reply]

Template:Help improve text (done)[new][edit source][reply]

content hidden
MediaWiki:Cleanup-helpimprove: (talk)

Science guidelines not met and/or referencing issues - just started[new][edit source][reply]

Manual of style not met - started[new][edit source][reply]

Too long - in progress[new][edit source][reply]

Science too complicated - done[new][edit source][reply]

image copyright issues[new][edit source][reply]

POV[new][edit source][reply]

Template:Stub text (done)[new][edit source][reply]

MediaWiki:Pagetriage-tags-stub-label: (talk)

NeedsImage[new][edit source][reply]

Add icon, does not contain text

Image essential (done)[new][edit source][reply]

Multiple issues - parameter error detected[new][edit source][reply]

Tidy citations - not working[new][edit source][reply]

Spelling or grammar[new][edit source][reply]

Accuracy - currently used by POV[new][edit source][reply]

MediaWiki:pagetriage-tags-disputed-desc This page has questionable factual accuracy.

Editorial guidelines - barely started[new][edit source][reply]

Rewrite for editorial guidelines[new][edit source][reply]

Future use[new][edit source][reply]

MediaWiki:Pagetriage-del-tags-cat-csd-desc: (talk)
MediaWiki:Pagetriage-del-tags-cat-csd-label: (talk)
MediaWiki:Pagetriage-page-status-delete: (talk)

Done[new][edit source][reply]

content hidden

References in visual editor[new][edit source][reply]

What was the bug?[new][edit source][reply]

Curious what the outstanding bug was since I don't have a record of it. I remember a series of awkward bugs on this but thought the last had been resolved so I'm curious. The categorizing by year was deliberate. Not a big issue to remove though. notjusttired (talk) 20:26, August 22, 2019 (EDT)

The bug was that, on every page with a "Cleanup" message, there was printed [[Category:from 2019]] underneath the infobox. This was not wikitext, but HTML visible to the reader. You probably noticed this one. Fixing this bug does not affect the categorizing by year. None of the categories have changed as a result of fixing this bug. There's still another bug left in the Cleanup template, but that can wait for another day. Hope this clarifies.
Pyrrhus (talk) 00:07, August 23, 2019 (EDT)
That bug was a nightmare. I thought I might have fixed it but wasn't sure. Thanks notjusttired (talk) 06:10, August 23, 2019 (EDT)

Remove categories based on cleanup date? -- Pyrrhus (talk) 18:51, July 12, 2019 (EDT)[new][edit source][reply]

Does anyone have an objection if I update this template to only add cleanup articles to one category: Category:All articles needing cleanup? It’s annoying to maintain separate categories based on date, such as Category:All articles needing cleanup from November 2015 and Category:Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from November 2015.
Pyrrhus (talk) 18:51, July 12, 2019 (EDT)

So no objections on removing the categories based on date?
Pyrrhus (talk) 22:12, July 14, 2019 (EDT)
No objections from me. Kmdenmark (talk) 15:12, July 24, 2019 (EDT)
I would like to move to having them by year ago - less to maintain but also we can quickly spot important pages that have been marked for cleanup since 2015. I don't understand the difference between Category:Articles needing cleanup and Category:All articles needing cleanup - but the last one has more pages in it. notjusttired (talk) 18:56, July 24, 2019 (EDT)

Add subcategories to cleanup category based on reason[new][edit source][reply]

I'm wondering about using subcategories for different reasons, with all still in the original category. I'm going to create a series of subtemplates anyway that can be picked to automatically fill out a particular reason (which people can add to). Suggested reasons listed below. notjusttired (talk) 19:49, July 13, 2019 (EDT)

Sounds interesting. What is the benefit of doing this?
Pyrrhus (talk) 23:33, July 19, 2019 (EDT)
Benefits would be that you could choose just to type of cleanup rather than facing hundreds of pages to choose from (although that list would be there too). So if you don't feel like doing references, you could do a bias/neutrality edit and just rephrase things. Or you could just sort out the images. Or just spelling. Also if using the visual editor you can make for cleanup by picking the Cleanup/spelling, Cleanup/bias etc from the menu instead of going your reason.

With categories, I think the categories for cleanup reason should not include a date, which would avoid the extra work of creating / deleting categories every year. I might try out creating one first, to get the coding right. notjusttired (talk) 18:58, July 24, 2019 (EDT)notjusttired (talk) 17:53, July 24, 2019 (EDT)

Sounds good. Thanks for doing it. Kmdenmark (talk) 14:05, August 1, 2019 (EDT)
  • accuracy - disputed
  • bias - promotional content, misleading or lacks neutrality disputed
  • citations needed
  • editorial - editorial guidelines not met
  • image copyright - no copyright information on image, or image may not be licensed for reuse
  • image essential
  • layout - poor or cluttered
  • multiple issues
  • spelling or grammar
  • rewrite (see Template:Cleanup-rewrite)
  • sources unreliable - may not meet science guidelines
  • tidy citations
  • too long
  • too technical

The ReplaceText feature can be used to move existing articles into a new subcategory

Short message tasks (labels)[new][edit source][reply]

  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-disputed-label⧽ accuracy is disputed
  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-cat-neutrality-label/pagetriage-tags-pov-label⧽ (Neutrality/POV - bias eg promotional content, misleading or lacks neutrality disputed)
  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-refimprove-label⧽ more citations needed/unsourced
  • editorial guidelines
  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-copyvio-label⧽ image copyright missing or images may not be licensed for reuse
  • Add new image image essential
  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-cleanupreorganise-label⧽ layout is poor or article is cluttered
  • The problems are: multiple issues
  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-copyedit-label⧽ spelling or grammar
  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-rewrite-label⧽ rewrite (quality standards)
  • science guidelines sources unscientific
  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-citationstyle-label⧽ / ⧼pagetriage-tags-linkrot-label⧽ (tidy citations) citation style/Bare URLs
  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-toolong-label⧽ too long
  • ⧼pagetriage-tags-tootechnical-label⧽ too technical

Clean up message change[new][edit source][reply]

Instead of just linking to the quality standards (MOS) I would like to link to both the editorial and science guidelines in the message as well. The are new and some existing editors won't have seen them. It will also make them much easier to find. notjusttired (talk) 19:49, July 13, 2019 (EDT)

Sounds good. We could as well just link to Category:MEpedia guidelines.
Pyrrhus (talk) 23:33, July 19, 2019 (EDT)

accuracy The "closeness of an observation to the true clinical state". With respect to diagnostic tests, "accuracy" means how specific and sensitive the test is.

accuracy The "closeness of an observation to the true clinical state". With respect to diagnostic tests, "accuracy" means how specific and sensitive the test is.

bias Bias in research is "a systematic deviation of an observation from the true clinical state". (Learn more: me-pedia.org)