Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Volume 14, Issue 1, 2007

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history

Titles and abstracts for the Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Volume 14, Issue 1, 2007.

Volume 14, Issue 1, 2007[edit | edit source]

  • Editorial by Elke Van Hoof, Kenny De Meirleir & Neil McGregor[1]
  • Service Utilization, Barriers to Service Access, and Coping in Adults with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

    "Abstract - Objective: In a sample of 47 adults with CFS, we aimed to describe patterns of service utilization, identify barriers to service access, and explore the relationship between service utilization and coping styles. Method: A questionnaire assessing service utilization frequency and barriers to service access was administered to a sample of 47 individuals with CFS. The Illness Management Questionnaire was used to assess relationships between coping styles and service utilization. Results: A Cochran's Q test of homogeneity revealed that medical and CFS self-help services were most frequently used and rehabilitation services were least frequently used. In terms of service accessibility,80.9% of participants reported at least one barrier. Lack of financial (including insurance) resources and lack of knowledge about service availability were the two most frequently reported. In terms of coping styles, symptom focusing was positively associated with use of CFS self-help services and with use of in-home services and social service agencies. Information seeking was negatively associated with use of in-home and social service agencies and with use of mental health services. Conclusion: These findings can be used by health-care professionals and advocacy-based organizations to develop programs focused on mass education campaigns for health-care providers, increase knowledge of service availability among individuals with CFS, and to understand relationships between certain types of coping styles and service preferences."[2]

  • The Feasibility of Reviewing Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Clients at a Distance: A Teleconference Pilot Study

    "Abstract - Objective: There continues to be a shortage of clinical staff specialising in the treatment of CFS (ME). In order to access specialist care, many clients have to undertake long or difficult journeys that may exacerbate their symptoms. This exploratory study aimed to reduce these travel problems by the introduction of a Teleconference Review Clinic (TRC). Method: ATRC was booked for six CFS clients who would normally have face-to-face review by specialists 44 miles away. Questionnaires were used to elicit the views of both clients being reviewed and clinicians undertaking the review at a distance. Differences in distances travelled by clients for conventional face to face and telemedicine review were calculated and comments about the teleconference made by clients and therapists were noted. Results: There was general satisfaction with the quality of the pictures and sound during the reviews. Clinicians were able to obtain all the information required to undertake all clinical assessments. For two clients the clinical management was changed after the consultation and for one client an issue was identified that required referral to another clinician. For clients who lived nearer to the teleconference hospital, the journey saved ranged between 1 mile and 85.8 miles, the mean being 64.2 miles. Conclusion: This pilot study does suggest that telemedicine in this area of medicine is logistically viable and effective, and indicates that a larger study is needed."[3]

  • Changes in Functional Status in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Over a Decade: Do Age and Gender Matter?

    "Abstract - Objective: Patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) have substantial deficits in functional capacity, but the course of these deficits over time has not often been studied. This study measured functional capacity on three occasions over a decade, in patients with CFS. Methods: The study was a longitudinal cohort study, and employed the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) instrument to assess physical and mental/emotional functional status. Results: Physical function, as reflected in several different scales, improved modestly but significantly over time, particularly for patients aged 18-60 years and for women. Mental/emotional function was not substantially impaired at the outset of the study, and did not change over time. Conclusion: This study found that physical function tended to improve for many patients over time, despite the fact that they were aging. Physical function did not deteriorate with time."[4]

  • Physiological Responses to Arm and Leg Exercise in Women Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

    "Abstract - Patients affected by chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS) characteristically show easy and unexplained fatigue after minimal exertion that does not resolve with rest and is associated with specific symptoms lasting for more than six months. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing is a valid procedure for determining functional capacity in patients with CFS. We compare cardioventilatory adaptation to exercise between a group of eighty-five consecutive women patients affected by CFS and a group of fifteen healthy women extremely sedentary individuals, with the use of maximum incremental exercise testing on a cycle ergometer and arm ergometer, assessing possible differences. The majority of values achieved at peak exhaustive exercise were significantly lower in CFS patients than controls, including the percentage of maximum oxygen uptake in arm physical test (37.4±10.0% in CFS vs. 58.9± 15.8% in controls) and leg physical test (53.4±15.0% in CFS patients vs. 76.2 ± 18.0%in controls). In conclusion, the CFS group shows a lower work capacity in arm or leg exercise that would not be justified exclusively by their personal characteristics or deconditioning."[5]

  • Personality Profile of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

    "Abstract - Personality may play a role in the predisposition, the precipitation and/or the maintenance of the CFS. Thirty-six consecutively examined female patients hospitalised for a sleep workup, filled out a Temperament and Character Inventory (TCI) questionnaire. A MANOVA compared the patients with a control group of females matched for age. Significant scores were obtained for dimensions such as Harm Avoidance, Reward Dependence, and Self-Directedness. However, the only subdimension of Harm Avoidance that proved significantly higher in CFS than in controls was “Fatigability,”; which is likely to overlap with the core CFS symptom. All in all, the personality structure does not appear to play a major role in the CFS."[6]

  • Body Mass Index and Fatigue Severity in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

    "Abstract - Background: It is uncertain how much fatigue is related to weight in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). Objective: To assess the association of body mass index (BMI) and fatigue in CFS patients. Methods: Consecutive patients seen in a referral-based specialty clinic were eligible if they met CFS criteria and had completed required measures. Fatigue measures were the vitality subscale of the Medical Outcomes Short-Form 36 and the global fatigue index from the Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue. Results: In women, there was no relationship between BMI and vitality subscale or global fatigue index scores (P = 0.99 and P = 0.44). For men, vitality subscale scores significantly decreased as BMI increased (P = 0.02). Conclusions: In CFS patients, the prevalence of obesity was low despite risk factors for weight gain. Fatigue severity and BMI were unrelated in women with CFS, but this relationship may differ for men."[7]

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. Elke Van Hoof, Kenny De Meirleir & Neil McGregor. (2007). Editorial. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 1-3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J092v14n01_01
  2. Thanawala, Sachi; Taylor, Renee R. (2007). "Service Utilization, Barriers to Service Access, and Coping in Adults with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome". Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. 14 (1): 5–21. doi:10.1300/J092v14n01_02.
  3. Gwyneth C. Weatherburn, Amelia Goldsmith Lister & Leslie J. Findley. (2007). The Feasibility of Reviewing Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Clients at a Distance: A Teleconference Pilot Study. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 23-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J092v14n01_03
  4. Rosalind M. Matthews & Anthony L. Komaroff. (2007). Changes in Functional Status in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Over a Decade: Do Age and Gender Matter? Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 33-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J092v14n01_04
  5. Casimiro Javierre, José Alegre, José Luis Ventura, Ana García-Quintana, Ramon Segura, Andrea Suarez, Alberto Morales, Agusti Comella & Kenny De Meirleir. (2007). Physiological Responses to Arm and Leg Exercise in Women Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 43-53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J092v14n01_05
  6. Olivier Le Bon Brugmann, Bernard Cappeliez, Daniel Neu, Luc Stulens, Guy Hoffmann, Michel Hansenne, Luc Lambrecht, Marc Ansseau & Paul Linkowski. (2007). Personality Profile of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 55-68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J092v14n01_06
  7. Ellen A. Schur, Carolyn Noonan, Wayne R. Smith, Jack Goldberg & Dedra Buchwald. (2007). Body Mass Index and Fatigue Severity in Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Journal of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, Vol. 14, Iss. 1, pp. 69-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J092v14n01_07