Trial By Error: Difference between revisions

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
VisualWikitext
m (Text replacement - "|last2=|first2=|authorlink2=|" to "|")
(Copying main trial by error articles for the PACE trial to this article from the PACE trial article, since that article is too long (See that article's discussion page). This section will be linked to from the main pace article)
Line 325: Line 325:
* July 3, 2020 - [https://www.virology.ws/2020/07/03/trial-by-error-nudge-for-bmj-about-music-therapy-letter-to-health-anxiety-expert/ Trial By Error: Nudge for BMJ About Music Therapy; Letter to “Health Anxiety” Expert]
* July 3, 2020 - [https://www.virology.ws/2020/07/03/trial-by-error-nudge-for-bmj-about-music-therapy-letter-to-health-anxiety-expert/ Trial By Error: Nudge for BMJ About Music Therapy; Letter to “Health Anxiety” Expert]


==Main Trial By Error articles on the PACE trial==
*Oct 21 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/10/21/trial-by-error-i/ "TRIAL BY ERROR: The Troubling Case of the PACE Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study"] 
*Oct 22 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/10/22/trial-by-error-ii/ "TRIAL BY ERROR: The Troubling Case of the PACE Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study (second instalment)"] 
*Oct 23 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/10/23/trial-by-error-iii/ "TRIAL BY ERROR: The Troubling Case of the PACE Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study (final installment)"]
*Oct 30 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/10/30/pace-trial-investigators-respond-to-david-tuller/ PACE trial investigators respond to David Tuller]
*Oct 30 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/10/30/david-tuller-responds-to-the-pace-investigators/ "David Tuller responds to the PACE Investigators"]
*Nov 4 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/11/04/trial-by-error-continued-did-the-pace-study-really-adopt-a-strict-criterion-for-recovery/ "Trial By Error, Continued: Did the PACE Study Really Adopt a ‘Strict Criterion’ for Recovery?"] 
*Nov 13 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/11/13/an-open-letter-to-dr-richard-horton-and-the-lancet/ "An open letter to Dr. Richard Horton and The Lancet"]
*Nov 17 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/11/17/trial-by-error-continued-pace-teams-work-for-insurance-companies-not-related-to-pace-really/ "Trial by error, Continued: PACE Team’s Work for Insurance Companies Is “Not Related” to PACE. Really?"]
*Dec 17 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/12/17/a-request-for-data-from-the-pace-trial/ A request for data from the PACE trial]
*Dec 22 2015 [http://www.virology.ws/2015/12/22/revisiting-the-plos-one-economics-analysis-of-pace/ Revisiting the PLoS One economics analysis of PACE]
*Jan 4 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/01/04/trial-by-error-continued-questions-for-dr-white-and-his-pace-colleagues/ Trial By Error, Continued: Questions for Dr. White and his PACE Colleagues]
*Jan 7 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/01/07/trial-by-error-continued-did-the-pace-trial-really-prove-that-graded-exercise-is-safe/ Trial By Error, Continued: Did the PACE Trial Really Prove that Graded Exercise Is Safe?] (with [[Julie Rehmeyer]])
*Jan 19 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/01/19/at-least-were-not-vexatious/ At least we’re not vexatious]
*Jan 19 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/01/19/trial-by-error-continued-more-nonsense-from-the-lancet-psychiatry/ Trial By Error, Continued: More Nonsense from The Lancet Psychiatry]
*Feb 1 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/02/01/trial-by-error-continued-a-few-words-about-harassment/ Trial By Error, Continued: A Few Words About “Harassment”]
*Feb 10 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/02/10/open-letter-lancet-again/ An open letter to The Lancet, again]
*May 23 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/05/23/an-open-letter-to-plos-one/. An open letter to PLoS One.]
*Jul 10, 2016 - [http://www.microbe.tv/twiv/twiv-397/ TWiV 397 podcast] with Dr. Tuller and Dr Racaniello  (1:03)
*Aug 29 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/08/29/once-again-lancet-stumbles-on-pace/ Once Again, Lancet Stumbles on PACE]
*Sep 1, 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/09/01/trial-by-error-continued-my-questions-for-lancet-editor-richard-horton/ Trial By Error, Continued: My Questions for Lancet Editor Richard Horton]
*Sept 6, 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/09/06/open-letter-to-queen-mary-university-london-about-pace/ Open letter to Queen Mary University of London about PACE] 
*Sept 22, 2016 [http://www.virology.ws/2016/09/22/trial-by-error-continued-the-real-data/ Trial By Error, Continued: The Real Data]
*Oct 27, 2016 [http://undark.org/article/chronic-fatigue-graded-exercise-pace/ ''Worse Than the Disease''] 
*Mar 13, 2017 [http://www.virology.ws/2017/03/13/an-open-letter-to-psychological-medicine-about-recovery-and-the-pace-trial/ An open letter to Psychological Medicine about “recovery” and the PACE trial]
*Mar 23, 2017  [http://www.virology.ws/2017/03/23/an-open-letter-to-psychological-medicine-again/ An open letter to Psychological Medicine, again!]


==See also==
==See also==

Revision as of 02:58, August 2, 2022

Trial By Error is a blog written by Dr David Tuller about ME/CFS with a particular focus on the UK PACE trial. It appears on the Virology blog sponsored by Dr. Vincent Racaniello.

2011[edit | edit source]

2015[edit | edit source]

2016[edit | edit source]

2017[edit | edit source]

2018[edit | edit source]

2019[edit | edit source]

2020[edit | edit source]

Main Trial By Error articles on the PACE trial[edit | edit source]

See also[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]

  1. ↑ Tuller, David (January 28, 2018). "Trial By Error: Steve Brine's Troubling Claim in Parliamentary Debate on ME". Virology blog. Retrieved January 28, 2019.

PACE trial A controversial study which claimed that CBT and GET were effective in treating "CFS/ME", despite the fact that its own data did not support this conclusion. Its results and methodology were widely disputed by patients, scientists, and the peer-reviewed scientific literature.

Retrieved from "https://me-pedia.org/w/index.php?title=Trial_By_Error&oldid=112263"