This page was created by volunteers like you!: Help us make it even better. To learn more about contributing to MEpedia, click here.
Join the movement: Visit #MEAction to find support or take action. Donate today to help us improve and expand this project.
Congratulations!: MEpedia has got over 30 million views as of August 2022!

Talk:Research bias in ME/CFS

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history

P-hacking[edit source | reply | new]

include null hypothesis significance testing

2010, Odds are it's wrong - Article

2016, The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose

2012, A peculiar prevalence of p values just below 0.05 (Abstract)

2013, The rise of p:"Just significant results are on the rise

2015?, What p-Hacking really looks like: A comment on Masicampo & Lalande (2012) (Full text)

2016, Degrees of Freedom in Planning, Running, Analyzing, and Reporting Psychological Studies: A Checklist to Avoid p-Hacking (Full text)

notjusttired (talk) 17:09, 21 April 2019 (EDT)

General[edit source | reply | new]

Retrieved from "https://me-pedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Research_bias_in_ME/CFS&oldid=55616"

MEpedia is a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of Myalgic Encephalomyelitis and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome science and history.
The information provided at this site is not intended to diagnose or treat any illness.