Bodily distress syndrome
This article is a stub.
Please help improve this page if you can
Evidence[edit | edit source]
Controversy[edit | edit source]
There has been concern from researchers, clinicians, patients with ME/CFS, chronic pain patients and others that a medical condition with a biological cause may be diagnosed with Bodily Distress Syndrome instead of a physical illness, which could result in the denial of medical tests to establish the correct diagnosis, the denial of medical care, and for severely ill patients possibly forced psychiatric treatment or hospitalization, such as that experienced by Karina Hansen and Sophia Mirza.
Notable studies[edit | edit source]
- 2019, Bodily Distress Syndrome: Concerns About Scientific Credibility in Research and Implementation(Full text)
See also[edit | edit source]
Learn more[edit | edit source]
References[edit | edit source]
- Spandler, Helen; Allen, Meg (Aug 16, 2017). "Contesting the psychiatric framing of ME/CFS" (PDF). Social Theory & Health. 16 (2): 127–141. doi:10.1057/s41285-017-0047-0. ISSN 1477-8211.
- O’Leary, D. (Jun 30, 2018). "Bodily distress syndrome: Concerns about scientific credibility in research and implementation". Journal of Biological Physics and Chemistry. 18 (2): 67–77t. doi:10.4024/07LE18A.jbpc.18.02.
Myalgic encephalomyelitis or chronic fatigue syndrome, often used when both illnesses are considered the same.