Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Search
Editing
Randomized controlled trial
From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
{{stub}} {{Cleanup/Citations needed | date = 2021}} A '''randomized controlled trial''' or '''RCT''' is a clinical treatment trial with at least two treatment groups, one receives the treatment being tested and the other group is either allocated to a waiting list or receives a [[placebo]], or sham therapy, or alternative treatment. Participants are allocated to a treatment group randomly rather than being able to choose whether to undergo the treatment being tested or the alternative. Treatment groups are known as ''arms''. ==Theory == Well-conducted RCTs or systematic reviews of RCTs are considered the highest standard of treatment evidence.<ref name="AppraiseEvidence">{{Cite web|url=https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/appraise-the-evidence/ | title = Appraise the evidence {{!}} BMJ Best Practice | last = BMJ | first = | authorlink = The BMJ | date = |website=|language=en-GB|archive-url=|archive-date=|url-status=|access-date=2020-09-18}}</ref> ==Types== *'''Unblinded:''' participants know whether the treatment is a placebo / sham or the one being tested, which introduces possible bias. ::This is particularly important when a trial's success is measured by [[subjective outcome]]s like participant or clinician questionnaires rather than independent measurable outcomes like employment rates, physiological measures (e.g., distance walked, heart rate, muscle strength, blood test results, hospital admissions). *'''Blinded (single blinded):''' participants do not know whether the treatment is a placebo / sham or the one being tested, but the researchers / clinicians delivering or assessing the treatment do know. Bias from clinicians may affect results, and may have an effect on patient reports, e.g., positive or negative clinician feedback, and clinician encouragement. *'''Double-blinded:''' participants and clinicians / researchers do not know whether the treatment is a placebo / sham or the one being tested, the researcher analyzing the trial data is also not aware which group received which intervention. ==Comparison== Other types of treatment evidence include: * '''Case studies:''' The treatment of one or more patients is described, typically without any original intention for the results to form part of research. These commonly identify treatments that may be worth further investigation, or diagnostic issues. In rare diseases, most evidence is in the form of case studies or expert consensus due to the very small number of patients available for trials. *'''Case series:''' A group of patients are reported on who share the same or similar characteristics, or who receive the same diagnosis or treatments. For example, outcomes of a group of 100 consecutive patients admitted to hospital ICU or outcomes of 12 patients receiving surgery for [[craniocervical instability]]. * '''Randomized trial:''' There are two or more treatment arms, which participants are randomly allocated to.<ref name="Glossary-R">{{Cite web|url=https://www.hra.nhs.uk/approvals-amendments/glossary/#r | title = Glossary | website = Health Research Authority|language=en-GB|access-date=2020-09-18}}</ref> Without a control group with a placebo or sham treatment for comparison, it is possible to determine which treatment is most effective but it is not be possible to determine if both are ineffective, harmful, or effective. *'''Expert consensus:''' A selected group of clinicians discuss or agree on diagnostic and/or treatment guidelines based on their personal experiences. Clinicians may be representatives of particular organisations or members of a particular professional organization. Examples include the Italian consensus for [[multiple chemical sensitivity]]. *'''Historical use''' or '''historical evidence''': A treatment that has been used for an extended period of time and prior to modern medicine systems may have been assessed as safe and/or effective based on considerable historic anecdotal evidence. This type of evidence commonly applies to certain [[alternative medicine]]s or [[:Category:Traditional Chinese medicine|traditional treatments]]. *'''Patient surveys:''' These are typically disregarded in evidence-based medicine, but can provide significant information on the effectiveness of real-world treatments that may differ from the results of RCTs, or on treatments that may be worth further funding RCTs for. Large surveys are commonly conducted by a number of ME/CFS [[:Category:patient groups|patient groups]]. In the case of [[graded exercise therapy]], patient surveys consistently reported both very high rates of harm and a lack of effectiveness which was not found by most RCTs. *'''Patient evidence:''' Individual patients are interviewed or asked to provide information based on their personal experiences. ==Limitations == {{Quote frame|text=It should be noted that the perfect RCT has yet to be undertaken. | author = | title = BMJ Best Practice Guide<ref name=2armed />|align=}} === Blinding === Double-blinded studies are typical in medication trials because it is easy to provide placebo medications that look like the intervention being tested. For some type of treatments, it may not be possible to blind participants to the intervention, for example in psychotherapy, counseling, or behavioral treatments such as [[cognitive behavioral therapy]] or [[graded exercise therapy]]. === Methodology === RCTs may have a variety of problems with methodology, that can affect the outcomes reported.<ref name="2armed">{{Cite web|url=https://bestpractice.bmj.com/info/toolkit/learn-ebm/appraising-2-armed-randomised-controlled-trials/ | title = Appraising 2-armed randomised controlled trials {{!}} BMJ Best Practice | last = BMJ | first = | authorlink = The BMJ | date = |website=|language=en-GB|archive-url=|archive-date=|url-status=|access-date=2020-09-18}}</ref> === Weighting === RCTs are not automatically of equal standing, and [[systematic review]]s assign a weighting to RCTs, which effectively ranks some RCTs as more significant than others.<ref name="2armed" /> The [[GRADE framework]] is a standardised way developed to compare different RCTs by assessing a number of factors from the trials, in order to provide an independent, systematic review of exercise. Both [[Cochrane]] and the systematic reviews created for the UK's [[NICE guidelines]] use the GRADE framework. The largest RCT of [[ME/CFS]] treatments to date is the highly controversial [[PACE trial]]. The PACE trial had significantly more participants than any other RCTs of [[graded exercise therapy]] and [[cognitive behavioral therapy]], for example the [[FINE trial]] tested the same treatments in severely ill patients but had far less participants. The FINE trial reported a null effect for the treatments, but the PACE trial reported a moderately positive result. The [[Cochrane]] systematic review of exercise as a therapy for CFS assigned a higher weight to the PACE trial results compared to the smaller FINE trial. ==Criticism== Several RCTs of the same treatment may produce very different results. For example, the PACE trial and it's sister trial the FINE trial tested the same interventions, one rating CBT and GET as moderately effective and [[adaptive pacing therapy]] as ineffective, and the other weighting CBT and GET as ineffective. RCTs are a type of treatment trial, and are not able to provide the sum of all evidence of the effectiveness of different treatment interventions. Outcomes from RCTs may differ significantly from real world results once a treatment is in use, with some successful RCTs treatments leading to either ineffective or harmful treatment reports. RCTs require organization, patient recruitment, and funding, which may not be available for some types of treatment or for some illnesses or treatments. ==Notable studies == *2018, The limitations of using randomised controlled trials as a basis for developing treatment guidelines<ref>{{Cite journal | last = Mulder | first = Roger | last2 = Singh | first2 = Ajeet B. | last3 = Hamilton | first3 = Amber | last4 = Das | first4 = Pritha | last5 = Outhred | first5 = Tim | last6 = Morris | first6 = Grace | last7 = Bassett | first7 = Darryl | last8 = Baune | first8 = Bernhard T. | last9 = Berk | first9 = Michael | date = 2018-02-01 | title = The limitations of using randomised controlled trials as a basis for developing treatment guidelines|url=https://ebmh.bmj.com/content/21/1/4|journal=Evidence-Based Mental Health|language=en|volume=21|issue=1 | pages = 4β6|doi=10.1136/eb-2017-102701|issn=1362-0347|pmid=28710065}}</ref> [https://ebmh.bmj.com/content/21/1/4.abstract (Abstract)] ==See also== * [[Research bias in ME/CFS]] * [[Intimidation and bullying of PACE trial critics]] * [[:Category:Research terminology|Research terminology]] (category) * [[Subjective outcome]] * [[PACE trial]] * [[FINE trial]] ==Learn more== * ==References== {{reflist}} [[Category:Research terminology]] [[Category:Clinical trial terminology]]
Summary:
Please make sure your edits are consistent with
MEpedia's guidelines
.
By saving changes, you agree to the
Terms of use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 3.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Templates used on this page:
Template:Ambox
(
edit
)
Template:Asbox
(
edit
)
Template:Category handler
(
edit
)
Template:Cite journal
(
edit
)
Template:Cite web
(
edit
)
Template:Cleanup
(
edit
)
Template:Cleanup/Citations needed
(
edit
)
Template:Cleanup reason text
(
edit
)
Template:DMC
(
edit
)
Template:DMCA
(
edit
)
Template:Dated maintenance category
(
edit
)
Template:Digits
(
edit
)
Template:FULLROOTPAGENAME
(
edit
)
Template:Full stop
(
edit
)
Template:Full stop character
(
edit
)
Template:GetFallback
(
edit
)
Template:Help improve text
(
edit
)
Template:LangSwitch
(
edit
)
Template:Last word
(
edit
)
Template:Main other
(
edit
)
Template:No fullstop
(
edit
)
Template:No fullstop/first
(
edit
)
Template:Ns has subpages
(
edit
)
Template:Quote frame
(
edit
)
Template:Reflist
(
edit
)
Template:Str endswith
(
edit
)
Template:Str len
(
edit
)
Template:Stub
(
view source
) (semi-protected)
Template:Stub text
(
edit
)
Template:Uselang
(
edit
)
Template:Year
(
edit
)
Module:Arguments
(
edit
)
Module:Asbox
(
edit
)
Module:Buffer
(
edit
)
Module:Category handler
(
edit
)
Module:Category handler/blacklist
(
edit
)
Module:Category handler/config
(
edit
)
Module:Category handler/data
(
edit
)
Module:Category handler/shared
(
edit
)
Module:Check for unknown parameters
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/COinS
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Configuration
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Date validation
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Identifiers
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Utilities
(
edit
)
Module:Citation/CS1/Whitelist
(
edit
)
Module:Message box/configuration
(
edit
)
Module:Message box by year
(
edit
)
Module:Namespace detect/config
(
edit
)
Module:Namespace detect/data
(
edit
)
Module:Navbar
(
edit
)
Module:No globals
(
edit
)
Module:Ns has subpages
(
edit
)
Module:String
(
edit
)
Module:Unsubst
(
edit
)
Module:Yesno
(
edit
)
This page is a member of 5 hidden categories:
Category:All articles needing cleanup from 2021
Category:All stub articles
Category:Articles needing many references adding from 2021
Category:Cleanup tagged articles with a reason field from 2021
Category:Stub pages last edited in 2023
Navigation
Navigation
Skip to content
Main page
Browse
Become an editor
Random page
Popular pages
Abbreviations
Glossary
About MEpedia
Links for editors
Contents
Guidelines
Recent changes
Pages in need
Search
Help
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs