Editing Whittemore Peterson Institute

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Warning: You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you log in or create an account, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.

The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then publish the changes below to finish undoing the edit.

Latest revision Your text
Line 7: Line 7:
An October 2009 paper by [[Vincent Lombardi]], [[Francis Ruscetti]], Jaydip Das Gupta, [[Max Pfost]], Kathryn S. Hagen, [[Daniel Peterson]], [[Sandra Ruscetti]], Rachel K. Bagni, Cari Petrow-Sadowski, Bert Gold, Michael Dean, [[Robert Silverman]] [[Judy Mikovits]] entitled "Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, [[XMRV]], in Blood Cells of Patients with [[Chronic Fatigue Syndrome]]" claimed to have found a link between chronic fatigue syndrome and the presence of the retrovirus.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal | last =Lombardi | first = Vincent C. | last2 = Ruscetti | first2 = Francis W. | last3 = Gupta | first3 = Jaydip Das | last4 = Pfost | first4=Max A. | last5 = Hagen | first5 = Kathryn S. | last6 = Peterson | first6 = Daniel L. | last7 = Ruscetti | first7 = Sandra K. | last8 = Bagni | first8 = Rachel K. | last9 = Petrow-Sadowski | first9 = Cari| date = 2009-10-23 | title = Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome|url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/326/5952/585|journal=Science|language=en|volume=326|issue=5952|pages=585–589|doi=10.1126/science.1179052|issn=0036-8075|pmid=19815723}}</ref> The paper's primary authors were at that time based at the Whittemore Peterson Institute (WPI) in Reno, Nevada, United States. The WPI soon began offering a controversial commercial XMRV testing service.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.prohealth.com/library/wpi-licensed-test-for-xmrv-variants-now-available-27560 | title = WPI-Licensed Test for XMRV & Variants Now Available | date = 2010-08-23 | website = Prohealth|language=en-US|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.meassociation.org.uk/2010/04/xmrv-testing-in-the-uk/ | title = XMRV testing in the UK| date = 2010-04-12 | website = [[ME Association]]|language=en-GB|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref>
An October 2009 paper by [[Vincent Lombardi]], [[Francis Ruscetti]], Jaydip Das Gupta, [[Max Pfost]], Kathryn S. Hagen, [[Daniel Peterson]], [[Sandra Ruscetti]], Rachel K. Bagni, Cari Petrow-Sadowski, Bert Gold, Michael Dean, [[Robert Silverman]] [[Judy Mikovits]] entitled "Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, [[XMRV]], in Blood Cells of Patients with [[Chronic Fatigue Syndrome]]" claimed to have found a link between chronic fatigue syndrome and the presence of the retrovirus.<ref name=":1">{{Cite journal | last =Lombardi | first = Vincent C. | last2 = Ruscetti | first2 = Francis W. | last3 = Gupta | first3 = Jaydip Das | last4 = Pfost | first4=Max A. | last5 = Hagen | first5 = Kathryn S. | last6 = Peterson | first6 = Daniel L. | last7 = Ruscetti | first7 = Sandra K. | last8 = Bagni | first8 = Rachel K. | last9 = Petrow-Sadowski | first9 = Cari| date = 2009-10-23 | title = Detection of an Infectious Retrovirus, XMRV, in Blood Cells of Patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome|url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/326/5952/585|journal=Science|language=en|volume=326|issue=5952|pages=585–589|doi=10.1126/science.1179052|issn=0036-8075|pmid=19815723}}</ref> The paper's primary authors were at that time based at the Whittemore Peterson Institute (WPI) in Reno, Nevada, United States. The WPI soon began offering a controversial commercial XMRV testing service.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.prohealth.com/library/wpi-licensed-test-for-xmrv-variants-now-available-27560 | title = WPI-Licensed Test for XMRV & Variants Now Available | date = 2010-08-23 | website = Prohealth|language=en-US|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.meassociation.org.uk/2010/04/xmrv-testing-in-the-uk/ | title = XMRV testing in the UK| date = 2010-04-12 | website = [[ME Association]]|language=en-GB|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref>


Other labs around the world were unable to detect XMRV in their patient samples. In July 2011 the journal issued an editorial expression of concern about the paper.<ref>{{Cite journal | last = Alberts | first=Bruce | date = 2011-07-01 | title = Editorial Expression of Concern|url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/333/6038/35.1|journal=Science|language=en|volume=333|issue=6038|pages=35–35|doi=10.1126/science.1208542|issn=0036-8075|pmid=21719658}}</ref>
Other labs around the world were unable to detect XMRV in their patient samples. In July 2011 the journal issued an editorial expression of concern about the paper.<ref>{{Cite journal | last = Alberts | first=Bruce | date = 2011-07-01|title=Editorial Expression of Concern|url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/333/6038/35.1|journal=Science|language=en|volume=333|issue=6038|pages=35–35|doi=10.1126/science.1208542|issn=0036-8075|pmid=21719658}}</ref>


The paper was fully retracted in December 2011 by the journal.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://retractionwatch.com/2011/12/22/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-xmrv-paper-retracted-by-science-completely-this-time/ | title = Chronic fatigue syndrome-XMRV paper retracted by Science, completely this time | last =Oransky | first = Author Ivan | date = 2011-12-22 | website = Retraction Watch|language=en-US|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | last = Alberts | first=Bruce | date = 2011-12-23 | title = Retraction|url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/334/6063/1636.1|journal=Science|language=en|volume=334|issue=6063|pages=1636–1636|doi=10.1126/science.334.6063.1636-a|issn=0036-8075|pmid=22194552}}</ref>
The paper was fully retracted in December 2011 by the journal.<ref>{{Cite web|url=https://retractionwatch.com/2011/12/22/chronic-fatigue-syndrome-xmrv-paper-retracted-by-science-completely-this-time/ | title = Chronic fatigue syndrome-XMRV paper retracted by Science, completely this time | last =Oransky | first = Author Ivan | date = 2011-12-22 | website = Retraction Watch|language=en-US|access-date=2020-02-19}}</ref><ref>{{Cite journal | last = Alberts | first=Bruce | date = 2011-12-23 | title = Retraction|url=https://science.sciencemag.org/content/334/6063/1636.1|journal=Science|language=en|volume=334|issue=6063|pages=1636–1636|doi=10.1126/science.334.6063.1636-a|issn=0036-8075|pmid=22194552}}</ref>
Please make sure your edits are consistent with MEpedia's guidelines. By saving changes, you agree to the Terms of use, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the CC BY-SA 3.0 License and the GFDL. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel Editing help (opens in new window)