MEpedia - User contributions [en]

User talk:Andyroo11

2021-10-21T18:45:27Z

Metoo:

{{Template:Welcome|realName=Andrew Bretherton|name=Andyroo11}}

-- [[User:New user message|New user message]] ([[User talk:New user message|talk]]) 09:57, October 15, 2021 (UTC)

== german petition ==
:Hi Andyroo11,
please take a look at [https://me-pedia.org/index.php?title=User_talk:Kmdenmark&curid=2288&diff=93440&oldid=93340&diffmode=source this]. It would be good if you can help to spread the info within remaining time. Thanks in advance. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 18:45, October 21, 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Kmdenmark

2021-10-21T01:00:23Z

Metoo:

[[/Old messages]]

[[/todolist]]

[[/templates]]

[[/Separate Site Notices]]

[[/Diagnostic biomarkers for ME/CFS]]

[[/EBV-dUTPase]]

[[/EET]]

[[/bulkimport]]

==Leave me a message ==

== Spelling of Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase vs indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase -- [[User:Loopy|Loopy]] ([[User talk:Loopy|talk]]) 20:03, April 28, 2021 (UTC) ==

Not certain which spelling is correct.

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/9/3/82

The above link spells IDO as indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase. But the page at MEpedia is [[Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase]]. (Note the "e" missing after "indol" on the link above.

Perhaps we need to correct the MEpedia page? For IDO, IDO1, and IDO2?

--[[User:Loopy|Loopy]] ([[User talk:Loopy|talk]]) 20:04, April 28, 2021 (UTC)

== Spam, Spam, not lovely .. ==

Hi. There is much more Spam. Look to my edits. Even [[Deep_Joshi|re-filled Pages]]. Let me tell you my experience: If you do not delete the SPAM immediately, it goes epidemic. 
If you decide to give me sysop-Flag, you may have less work to do yourself. Regards. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 06:54, August 15, 2021 (UTC)

: Thank you for flagging the spam pages! They are deleted now. Hope they don't grow back. [[User:Kmdenmark|Kmdenmark]] ([[User talk:Kmdenmark|talk]]) 19:32, October 7, 2021 (UTC)

::The SpamBots will not stop. Best advice is to delete all Spam as fast as possible. If i got sysop-flag i would be able to delete the Spam instantly and eventually try to install some filters to prevent Spam. Probably there is some more Spampages still undeleted. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 14:48, October 8, 2021 (UTC)

::Hi [[User:Kmdenmark]]. I think this IP needs blocking https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/103.94.252.85 plus 103.94.252.82 unless you already blocked it, both for edit warring with [[User:Metoo]] over spam, plus creating a spam page for [[Dr. Sandesh Lamsal]].
::[[User:Metoo]] Thank you for flagging up the spam and deleting it. You can also add <code><nowiki> [[Category:Articles for deletion]]</nowiki></code> to any spam pages including templates. We are expecting up update the MW version soon which will add extra extensions to pick up spam too, and allow for more custom user rights. ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 23:57, October 10, 2021 (UTC)

==Spammer==
This new account has the same name as a business and looks likely to be a spammer. Account just created but no edits yet. https://me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pitsdatarecovery
: ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 01:54, October 13, 2021 (UTC)
===Spammer 2===
Can you please block this person https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/113.199.248.116 and more importantly delete the page they created ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 18:06, October 14, 2021 (UTC)

== German Petition ==

Hello Kmdenmark.
 There is a banner on all pages in the wiki and its quite old and a bit annoying. And right now there is an import event worth to announce broadly :
 There is a petition running for german parliament Bundestag.
 The bad news is: For now there not enough subscribers.
 The good news is: subscribing is not limited to german people! So all people can sign this petition which demands more action about CFS !
* <big> <big> https://signformecfs.com/ </big></big>
I would highly appreciate if someone would install a banner that appeals signing the petition! Progress in a country like Germany will help fighting CFS globally!
 Please establish a banner with that link - petition is still running for 19 days yet! --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 00:59, October 21, 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Kmdenmark

2021-10-21T00:59:47Z

Metoo:/* German Petition -- ~~~~ -- ~~~~ */ new section

[[/Old messages]]

[[/todolist]]

[[/templates]]

[[/Separate Site Notices]]

[[/Diagnostic biomarkers for ME/CFS]]

[[/EBV-dUTPase]]

[[/EET]]

[[/bulkimport]]

==Leave me a message ==

== Spelling of Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase vs indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase -- [[User:Loopy|Loopy]] ([[User talk:Loopy|talk]]) 20:03, April 28, 2021 (UTC) ==

Not certain which spelling is correct.

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/9/3/82

The above link spells IDO as indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase. But the page at MEpedia is [[Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase]]. (Note the "e" missing after "indol" on the link above.

Perhaps we need to correct the MEpedia page? For IDO, IDO1, and IDO2?

--[[User:Loopy|Loopy]] ([[User talk:Loopy|talk]]) 20:04, April 28, 2021 (UTC)

== Spam, Spam, not lovely .. ==

Hi. There is much more Spam. Look to my edits. Even [[Deep_Joshi|re-filled Pages]]. Let me tell you my experience: If you do not delete the SPAM immediately, it goes epidemic. 
If you decide to give me sysop-Flag, you may have less work to do yourself. Regards. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 06:54, August 15, 2021 (UTC)

: Thank you for flagging the spam pages! They are deleted now. Hope they don't grow back. [[User:Kmdenmark|Kmdenmark]] ([[User talk:Kmdenmark|talk]]) 19:32, October 7, 2021 (UTC)

::The SpamBots will not stop. Best advice is to delete all Spam as fast as possible. If i got sysop-flag i would be able to delete the Spam instantly and eventually try to install some filters to prevent Spam. Probably there is some more Spampages still undeleted. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 14:48, October 8, 2021 (UTC)

::Hi [[User:Kmdenmark]]. I think this IP needs blocking https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/103.94.252.85 plus 103.94.252.82 unless you already blocked it, both for edit warring with [[User:Metoo]] over spam, plus creating a spam page for [[Dr. Sandesh Lamsal]].
::[[User:Metoo]] Thank you for flagging up the spam and deleting it. You can also add <code><nowiki> [[Category:Articles for deletion]]</nowiki></code> to any spam pages including templates. We are expecting up update the MW version soon which will add extra extensions to pick up spam too, and allow for more custom user rights. ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 23:57, October 10, 2021 (UTC)

==Spammer==
This new account has the same name as a business and looks likely to be a spammer. Account just created but no edits yet. https://me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pitsdatarecovery
: ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 01:54, October 13, 2021 (UTC)
===Spammer 2===
Can you please block this person https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/113.199.248.116 and more importantly delete the page they created ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 18:06, October 14, 2021 (UTC)

== German Petition -- [[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 00:59, October 21, 2021 (UTC) -- [[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 00:59, October 21, 2021 (UTC) ==

Hello Kmdenmark.
 There is a banner on all pages in the wiki and its quite old and a bit annoying. And right now there is an import event worth to announce broadly :
 There is a petition running for german parliament Bundestag.
 The bad news is: For now there not enough subscribers.
 The good news is: subscribing is not limited to german people! So all people can sign this petition which demands more action about CFS !
* <big> <big> https://signformecfs.com/ </big></big>
I would highly appreciate if someone would install a banner that appeals signing the petition! Progress in a country like Germany will help fighting CFS globally!
 Please establish a banner with that link - petition is still running for 19 days yet! --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 00:59, October 21, 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Metoo

2021-10-08T14:58:23Z

Metoo:/* Test -- ~~~~ */ new section

{{Template:Welcome|realName=|name=Metoo}}

-- [[User:New user message|New user message]] ([[User talk:New user message|talk]]) 18:06, August 4, 2021 (UTC)

== Test -- [[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 14:58, October 8, 2021 (UTC) ==

fooo. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 14:58, October 8, 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Kmdenmark

2021-10-08T14:48:10Z

Metoo:/* Spam, Spam, not lovely .. */

User talk:JaimeS

2021-10-05T03:42:44Z

Metoo:garbage ..

==Leave me a message ==
==Flow cytometry and other images==
I uploaded some images relating to flow cytometry, and [[:Category:Abnormal findings]] contains many other research images that should possibly be used more. I find the image descriptions for the immunological findings from flow cytometry hard to follow so don't see myself using them. I only found the one study with it. ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 10:23, June 27, 2020 (EDT)

==Time zone setting ==
Hi Jaime. I am not sure where you are based but I think your time zone setting in your "user preferences" could be wrong or correct but still causing confusion. The time stamps sometimes look wrong at first because all get converted to EDT on '''talk pages''', but the Recent Changes page shows your local time, so they don't match. That might explain recent confusion.

Also have got thought about creating a user page? It's a little confusing to tag you and see it appear as a red link. New users get pages created for them now, but that wasn't in place way back when you created your account. [[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 12:32, September 18, 2019 (EDT)

==Guido den Broeder ==
[[User:JaimeS]] I would like to formally request a block on Guido den Broeder for all pages unless he is totally willing change his current pattern of behavior in general, and toward other editors, and resolve the '''four issues''' below. Also tagging [[User:Kmdenmark]] and [[User:JenB]] as active admins.

1. I thought perhaps there was a way forward with Guido but his recent post on my page indicates his total rejection of existing [[MEpedia:Manual of style]], [[MEpedia:editorial guidelines]], and [[MEpedia:Science guidelines]] and his intention to rewrite them then invite "friends" to join his takeover on MEpedia. Editors are expected to agree to follow these guidelines and he has at the moment said he won't. He has further removed an undiscussed suggestion of mine from [[MEpedia_talk:Manual of style]], which is not allowed.

It is now impossible for me to assume good faith given he has described bad faith intentions. After have told him to quit harassing me and leave my talk page only, only for him to call him a stalker on [[User_talk:Kmdenmark#Notjusttired]] minutes later and request that I be banned site wide. From my talk page:

:'''Manual of style '''
'''The Manual of style was in part created by editors that are no longer around, with random edits by you in between. I intend to change it to make it easier for ME patients to contribute, before inviting other ME patients to join this project. For now, just remember that the MoS is not mandatory, especially not on pages that are still work in progress. They are guidance, not policy. Allowing users to contribute in a style that they feel comfortable with has priority. Guido den Broeder (talk) 17:36, September 15, 2019 (EDT)''' - my reply here -[[User_talk:Notjusttired#Manual_of_style]]'''
 
Guido has deleted [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=MEpedia_talk:Manual_of_style&diff=prev&oldid=70031&diffmode=source my request for a link policy] entirely from the MOS talk page without discussion.
2. Assuming he does decide to agree to follow current policies and to negotiate changes rather than overwrite existing guidelines and deleting others' suggestions for changes, then I would like his number of rude comments,[https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malcx#September 1], baseless accusations[https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kmdenmark#Malcx 1] [https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kmdenmark#Notjusttired 2] - including calling me a "stalker" only after I told him to stop harassing me and to not post on my talk page - and uncivil comments directed at various with including myself, but especially [[User:Malcx]] to be addressed.

3. The reverting of unread changes[https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:ME/cvs_Vereniging&diff=prev&oldid=69919&diffmode=source 1] and resulting edit warring[https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?limit=200&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Guido+den+Broeder&namespace=0&tagfilter=&start=&end= 2] - repeated re-reversing of inappropriate edits (rrv) and the use of "copyedit" comments to mask reversing neutrality edits - with [[User:Malcx]] [[User:Pyrrhus]] and myself on "rival" ME patient charity ME/cvs_Vereniging [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME/cvs_Vereniging&action=history here] would also need addressing, although some of this might not occur again if he is unable to edit those pages. I have previously [https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Notjusttired#Slowdown raised conflict of interest with him]
 
4. Assuming that is done I request a permanent ban on editing
*his user page, ("internationally famous", links to his chess scores, novel, imdb page, changes his page's category, etc) - changes/reverts continuing for at least 2 years now - [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Guido_den_Broeder&type=revision&diff=68421&oldid=68405&diffmode=source 1] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Guido_den_Broeder&type=revision&diff=68335&oldid=68323&diffmode=source 2] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Guido_den_Broeder&type=revision&diff=21348&oldid=20986&diffmode=source 3] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Guido_den_Broeder&type=revision&diff=29666&oldid=27157&diffmode=source 4]
*all Dutch charity websites - including the one he runs [[ME Vereniging Nederland]], and [[ME/cvs Vereniging]] which he adds potentially false info to - especially given the constant reverting without reason, unsourced statements, conflict of interest edits, using self-promotion (dozens of links to wikisage, paraduin.nl - both his) and adding unreferenced edits to other Dutch charity pages, claiming [
his charity [[ME Vereniging Nederland]] is the only ME charity, and reversing edits for neutrality,[https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=68270&oldid=19663&diffmode=source 1] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=70021&oldid=70017&diffmode=source 2], [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=69955&oldid=69950&diffmode=source 3] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=68270&oldid=19663&diffmode=source 4] with "copyedit" or "rvv" comments, MOS, reference improvements [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=70016&oldid=70014&diffmode=source 5], citation needed and grammar. I have raised with him the conflict of interest in editing other Dutch patient charities than his own, including adding unsourced statements. He has responded by edit warring with myself and two others - even reversing "citation needed" and grammar edits. Of particular concern is the claim on his charity page that is it "the" ME charity of the Netherlands, when there are three. I have suggested ways forward -[https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/Talk:ME_Vereniging_Nederland 1] [https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/Talk:ME/cvs_Vereniging 2], ways to rephrase, but to no avail - instead he has threatened me requesting with a "topic ban" unless I voluntarily cease editing Dutch charities, and a site ban.

So the issues being
#ignoring all guidelines and reverting edits that follow them
#uncivil behavior, and baseless accusations aimed at other editors
#unsourced, biased, self-promotional edits on multiple pages, reversing any edits that revert them, and reversing unread edits
#assuming those can be resolved then ban from his own page, and all Dutch charities to prevent access given this behavior has happened whenever he has returned to edit MEpedia

I am sorry that there are not any other solutions I can suggest other than to see if he is willing to change - with restrictions in place - or otherwise a permanent block. He has been asked so many times to follow our collaborative way of working, had a lot of explanation, and been asked for an explanation of the reverts but without any way forward.
Thank your for the time taken to read and please let me know if you need more info. [[User:Notjusttired|notjusttired]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 20:11, September 15, 2019 (EDT)

{{collapse bottom}}

: Thanks for the summary [[User:notjusttired]] and as I've mentioned elsewhere I support the block. As additional support I'd like to just say I think the overall level of rudeness to [[User:notjusttired]] has been the worst, showing a level of arrogance and unwillingness to cooperate that is simply not good for the community and quality of content on the site.

: Guido also seems to think/act as if he authoritative and speaks for the whole community, for example telling me "Go away, we don't want you here." [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:ME/cvs_Vereniging&diff=prev&oldid=69926&diffmode=source 1] ( I concede my following edit of {citation needed} to that was perhaps not the most grown up response :) .)
: [[User:Malcx|Malcx]] ([[User talk:Malcx|talk]]) 21:09, September 15, 2019 (EDT)

===Reply===
* As chair of GAME, I know many of the world's leading advocates and researchers. Some of them would be willing to contribute here if they could do that unhindered by not knowledgable editors with a Wikipedia warrior attitude, who think style trumps content. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 12:54, September 16, 2019 (EDT)
* [[User:notjusttired]], if you want to be taken seriously as an editor at all, don't support and copy the vandals. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 13:13, September 16, 2019 (EDT)

== Slack Group? ==

Hi Jaime, sorry to bother you. I was just wondering if you knew whom I could ask about joining the Slack Group?
 Many thanks!
 [[User:Pyrrhus|Pyrrhus]] ([[User talk:Pyrrhus|talk]]) 22:13, 19 March 2019 (EDT)

[[User:Pyrrhus|Pyrrhus]], drop me an email at jaime@meaction.net! We need an email address to be able to invite you.

:Thanks so much!
:[[User:Pyrrhus|Pyrrhus]] ([[User talk:Pyrrhus|talk]]) 21:30, 22 March 2019 (EDT)

== Request for adminship ==

Hi Jaime,

Could you upgrade my user rights group to administrator so I can deal with vandalism an harassment as displayed by [[user:Malcx]] who is not contributing anything to this project? We seem to have too few active admins, there hasn't been one online for days now. I have some 12 years of experience as administrator, bureaucrat and supervisor on various wiki's. Cheers, [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 12:33, September 16, 2019 (EDT)

== The SPAM problem ==

Hello.

You are have sysop-rights to the wiki, so i may point your Attention to [https://me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kmdenmark#Spam.2C_Spam.2C_not_lovely_.._--_.7E.7E.7E.7E the SPAM problem]. cheers. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 03:40, October 5, 2021 (UTC)

User talk:JaimeS

2021-10-05T03:40:52Z

Metoo:/* -- ~~~~ */ new section

==Leave me a message ==
==Flow cytometry and other images==
I uploaded some images relating to flow cytometry, and [[:Category:Abnormal findings]] contains many other research images that should possibly be used more. I find the image descriptions for the immunological findings from flow cytometry hard to follow so don't see myself using them. I only found the one study with it. ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 10:23, June 27, 2020 (EDT)

==Time zone setting ==
Hi Jaime. I am not sure where you are based but I think your time zone setting in your "user preferences" could be wrong or correct but still causing confusion. The time stamps sometimes look wrong at first because all get converted to EDT on '''talk pages''', but the Recent Changes page shows your local time, so they don't match. That might explain recent confusion.

Also have got thought about creating a user page? It's a little confusing to tag you and see it appear as a red link. New users get pages created for them now, but that wasn't in place way back when you created your account. [[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 12:32, September 18, 2019 (EDT)

==Guido den Broeder ==
[[User:JaimeS]] I would like to formally request a block on Guido den Broeder for all pages unless he is totally willing change his current pattern of behavior in general, and toward other editors, and resolve the '''four issues''' below. Also tagging [[User:Kmdenmark]] and [[User:JenB]] as active admins.

1. I thought perhaps there was a way forward with Guido but his recent post on my page indicates his total rejection of existing [[MEpedia:Manual of style]], [[MEpedia:editorial guidelines]], and [[MEpedia:Science guidelines]] and his intention to rewrite them then invite "friends" to join his takeover on MEpedia. Editors are expected to agree to follow these guidelines and he has at the moment said he won't. He has further removed an undiscussed suggestion of mine from [[MEpedia_talk:Manual of style]], which is not allowed.

It is now impossible for me to assume good faith given he has described bad faith intentions. After have told him to quit harassing me and leave my talk page only, only for him to call him a stalker on [[User_talk:Kmdenmark#Notjusttired]] minutes later and request that I be banned site wide. From my talk page:

:'''Manual of style '''
'''The Manual of style was in part created by editors that are no longer around, with random edits by you in between. I intend to change it to make it easier for ME patients to contribute, before inviting other ME patients to join this project. For now, just remember that the MoS is not mandatory, especially not on pages that are still work in progress. They are guidance, not policy. Allowing users to contribute in a style that they feel comfortable with has priority. Guido den Broeder (talk) 17:36, September 15, 2019 (EDT)''' - my reply here -[[User_talk:Notjusttired#Manual_of_style]]'''
 
Guido has deleted [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=MEpedia_talk:Manual_of_style&diff=prev&oldid=70031&diffmode=source my request for a link policy] entirely from the MOS talk page without discussion.
2. Assuming he does decide to agree to follow current policies and to negotiate changes rather than overwrite existing guidelines and deleting others' suggestions for changes, then I would like his number of rude comments,[https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Malcx#September 1], baseless accusations[https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kmdenmark#Malcx 1] [https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kmdenmark#Notjusttired 2] - including calling me a "stalker" only after I told him to stop harassing me and to not post on my talk page - and uncivil comments directed at various with including myself, but especially [[User:Malcx]] to be addressed.

3. The reverting of unread changes[https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:ME/cvs_Vereniging&diff=prev&oldid=69919&diffmode=source 1] and resulting edit warring[https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?limit=200&title=Special%3AContributions&contribs=user&target=Guido+den+Broeder&namespace=0&tagfilter=&start=&end= 2] - repeated re-reversing of inappropriate edits (rrv) and the use of "copyedit" comments to mask reversing neutrality edits - with [[User:Malcx]] [[User:Pyrrhus]] and myself on "rival" ME patient charity ME/cvs_Vereniging [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME/cvs_Vereniging&action=history here] would also need addressing, although some of this might not occur again if he is unable to edit those pages. I have previously [https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Notjusttired#Slowdown raised conflict of interest with him]
 
4. Assuming that is done I request a permanent ban on editing
*his user page, ("internationally famous", links to his chess scores, novel, imdb page, changes his page's category, etc) - changes/reverts continuing for at least 2 years now - [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Guido_den_Broeder&type=revision&diff=68421&oldid=68405&diffmode=source 1] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Guido_den_Broeder&type=revision&diff=68335&oldid=68323&diffmode=source 2] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Guido_den_Broeder&type=revision&diff=21348&oldid=20986&diffmode=source 3] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Guido_den_Broeder&type=revision&diff=29666&oldid=27157&diffmode=source 4]
*all Dutch charity websites - including the one he runs [[ME Vereniging Nederland]], and [[ME/cvs Vereniging]] which he adds potentially false info to - especially given the constant reverting without reason, unsourced statements, conflict of interest edits, using self-promotion (dozens of links to wikisage, paraduin.nl - both his) and adding unreferenced edits to other Dutch charity pages, claiming [
his charity [[ME Vereniging Nederland]] is the only ME charity, and reversing edits for neutrality,[https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=68270&oldid=19663&diffmode=source 1] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=70021&oldid=70017&diffmode=source 2], [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=69955&oldid=69950&diffmode=source 3] [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=68270&oldid=19663&diffmode=source 4] with "copyedit" or "rvv" comments, MOS, reference improvements [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=ME_Vereniging_Nederland&type=revision&diff=70016&oldid=70014&diffmode=source 5], citation needed and grammar. I have raised with him the conflict of interest in editing other Dutch patient charities than his own, including adding unsourced statements. He has responded by edit warring with myself and two others - even reversing "citation needed" and grammar edits. Of particular concern is the claim on his charity page that is it "the" ME charity of the Netherlands, when there are three. I have suggested ways forward -[https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/Talk:ME_Vereniging_Nederland 1] [https://www.me-pedia.org/wiki/Talk:ME/cvs_Vereniging 2], ways to rephrase, but to no avail - instead he has threatened me requesting with a "topic ban" unless I voluntarily cease editing Dutch charities, and a site ban.

So the issues being
#ignoring all guidelines and reverting edits that follow them
#uncivil behavior, and baseless accusations aimed at other editors
#unsourced, biased, self-promotional edits on multiple pages, reversing any edits that revert them, and reversing unread edits
#assuming those can be resolved then ban from his own page, and all Dutch charities to prevent access given this behavior has happened whenever he has returned to edit MEpedia

I am sorry that there are not any other solutions I can suggest other than to see if he is willing to change - with restrictions in place - or otherwise a permanent block. He has been asked so many times to follow our collaborative way of working, had a lot of explanation, and been asked for an explanation of the reverts but without any way forward.
Thank your for the time taken to read and please let me know if you need more info. [[User:Notjusttired|notjusttired]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 20:11, September 15, 2019 (EDT)

{{collapse bottom}}

: Thanks for the summary [[User:notjusttired]] and as I've mentioned elsewhere I support the block. As additional support I'd like to just say I think the overall level of rudeness to [[User:notjusttired]] has been the worst, showing a level of arrogance and unwillingness to cooperate that is simply not good for the community and quality of content on the site.

: Guido also seems to think/act as if he authoritative and speaks for the whole community, for example telling me "Go away, we don't want you here." [https://www.me-pedia.org/index.php?title=Talk:ME/cvs_Vereniging&diff=prev&oldid=69926&diffmode=source 1] ( I concede my following edit of {citation needed} to that was perhaps not the most grown up response :) .)
: [[User:Malcx|Malcx]] ([[User talk:Malcx|talk]]) 21:09, September 15, 2019 (EDT)

===Reply===
* As chair of GAME, I know many of the world's leading advocates and researchers. Some of them would be willing to contribute here if they could do that unhindered by not knowledgable editors with a Wikipedia warrior attitude, who think style trumps content. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 12:54, September 16, 2019 (EDT)
* [[User:notjusttired]], if you want to be taken seriously as an editor at all, don't support and copy the vandals. [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 13:13, September 16, 2019 (EDT)

== Slack Group? ==

Hi Jaime, sorry to bother you. I was just wondering if you knew whom I could ask about joining the Slack Group?
 Many thanks!
 [[User:Pyrrhus|Pyrrhus]] ([[User talk:Pyrrhus|talk]]) 22:13, 19 March 2019 (EDT)

[[User:Pyrrhus|Pyrrhus]], drop me an email at jaime@meaction.net! We need an email address to be able to invite you.

:Thanks so much!
:[[User:Pyrrhus|Pyrrhus]] ([[User talk:Pyrrhus|talk]]) 21:30, 22 March 2019 (EDT)

== Request for adminship ==

Hi Jaime,

Could you upgrade my user rights group to administrator so I can deal with vandalism an harassment as displayed by [[user:Malcx]] who is not contributing anything to this project? We seem to have too few active admins, there hasn't been one online for days now. I have some 12 years of experience as administrator, bureaucrat and supervisor on various wiki's. Cheers, [[User:Guido den Broeder|Guido den Broeder]] ([[User talk:Guido den Broeder|talk]]) 12:33, September 16, 2019 (EDT)

== -- [[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 03:40, October 5, 2021 (UTC) ==

== The SPAM problem ==

Hello.

You are have sysop-rights to the wiki, so i may point your Attention to [https://me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kmdenmark#Spam.2C_Spam.2C_not_lovely_.._--_.7E.7E.7E.7E the SPAM problem]. cheers. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 03:40, October 5, 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Brettz9

2021-10-05T03:39:36Z

Metoo:fix...

== The SPAM problem ==

Hello.

You are have sysop-rights to the wiki, so i may point your Attention to [https://me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kmdenmark#Spam.2C_Spam.2C_not_lovely_.._--_.7E.7E.7E.7E the SPAM problem]. cheers. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 17:16, September 8, 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Brettz9

2021-09-08T17:16:46Z

Metoo:/* -- ~~~~ */ new section

== -- [[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 17:16, September 8, 2021 (UTC) ==

Hello.

You are have sysop-rights to the wiki, so i may point your Attention to [https://me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Kmdenmark#Spam.2C_Spam.2C_not_lovely_.._--_.7E.7E.7E.7E the SPAM problem]. cheers. --[[User:Metoo|Metoo]] ([[User talk:Metoo|talk]]) 17:16, September 8, 2021 (UTC)

User talk:Metoo

2021-08-31T08:13:27Z

Metoo:Metoo moved page Template talk:Metoo to User talk:Metoo over redirect:SPAMMER-War ...

{{Template:Welcome|realName=|name=Metoo}}

-- [[User:New user message|New user message]] ([[User talk:New user message|talk]]) 18:06, August 4, 2021 (UTC)

User:Metoo

2021-08-31T08:10:59Z

Metoo:Trying to fight SPAM ...

Trying to fight SPAM ...

File:Vaccine.png

2021-08-20T19:52:17Z

Metoo:do not refer to wikipediaarticle, refer to file

Title: Vaccine

Source: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vaccine.png Wikimedia Commons]

Author: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:BruceBlaus Bruce Blaus]

License: Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ (CC BY-SA 4.0)]

{{CC-by-sa-4.0}}

User talk:Kmdenmark

2021-08-15T07:01:55Z

Metoo:

User talk:Kmdenmark

2021-08-15T06:54:59Z

Metoo:/* Spam, Spam, not lovely .. -- ~~~~ */ new section

User talk:HamzhaSaleem

2021-08-04T18:33:16Z

Metoo:Replaced content with " Spammer..."

Spammer...