User talk:Kmdenmark: Difference between revisions

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
(spammer)
m (→‎Spammer: another)
Line 46: Line 46:
This new account has the same name as a business and looks likely to be a spammer. Account just created but no edits yet. https://me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pitsdatarecovery
This new account has the same name as a business and looks likely to be a spammer. Account just created but no edits yet. https://me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pitsdatarecovery
:  ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 01:54, October 13, 2021 (UTC)
:  ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 01:54, October 13, 2021 (UTC)
===Spammer 2===
Can you please block this person https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/113.199.248.116 and more importantly delete the page they created  ~[[User:Notjusttired|Njt]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 18:06, October 14, 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:06, October 14, 2021

/Old messages

/todolist

/templates

/Separate Site Notices

/Diagnostic biomarkers for ME/CFS

/EBV-dUTPase

/EET

/bulkimport

Leave me a message[edit source | reply | new]

Spelling of Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase vs indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase -- Loopy (talk) 20:03, April 28, 2021 (UTC)[edit source | reply | new]

Not certain which spelling is correct.

https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4418/9/3/82

The above link spells IDO as indolamine-2,3-dioxygenase. But the page at MEpedia is Indoleamine-2,3-dioxygenase. (Note the "e" missing after "indol" on the link above.

Perhaps we need to correct the MEpedia page? For IDO, IDO1, and IDO2?

--Loopy (talk) 20:04, April 28, 2021 (UTC)


Spam, Spam, not lovely ..[edit source | reply | new]

Hi. There is much more Spam. Look to my edits. Even re-filled Pages. Let me tell you my experience: If you do not delete the SPAM immediately, it goes epidemic.
If you decide to give me sysop-Flag, you may have less work to do yourself. Regards. --Metoo (talk) 06:54, August 15, 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for flagging the spam pages! They are deleted now. Hope they don't grow back. Kmdenmark (talk) 19:32, October 7, 2021 (UTC)
The SpamBots will not stop. Best advice is to delete all Spam as fast as possible. If i got sysop-flag i would be able to delete the Spam instantly and eventually try to install some filters to prevent Spam. Probably there is some more Spampages still undeleted. --Metoo (talk) 14:48, October 8, 2021 (UTC)
Hi User:Kmdenmark. I think this IP needs blocking https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/103.94.252.85 plus 103.94.252.82 unless you already blocked it, both for edit warring with User:Metoo over spam, plus creating a spam page for Dr. Sandesh Lamsal.
User:Metoo Thank you for flagging up the spam and deleting it. You can also add [[Category:Articles for deletion]] to any spam pages including templates. We are expecting up update the MW version soon which will add extra extensions to pick up spam too, and allow for more custom user rights. ~Njt (talk) 23:57, October 10, 2021 (UTC)

Spammer[edit source | reply | new]

This new account has the same name as a business and looks likely to be a spammer. Account just created but no edits yet. https://me-pedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Pitsdatarecovery

~Njt (talk) 01:54, October 13, 2021 (UTC)

Spammer 2[edit source | reply | new]

Can you please block this person https://me-pedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/113.199.248.116 and more importantly delete the page they created ~Njt (talk) 18:06, October 14, 2021 (UTC)