Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Search
Editing
The Mental Health Movement: Persecution of Patients?
(section)
From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Tactics of denial employed by Wessely School psychiatrists == Professor Hooper's report describes in detail tactics of denial used by the [[Wessely school]], including those used in relation to [[ME/CFS]]: * Grouping illnesses together and "denying the physical reality" of them, claiming that they are the same psychiatric condition - any syndrome that medicine does not yet have an "exact, confirmed pathoaetiology for" including [[fibromyalgia]], [[multiple chemical sensitivity]], chronic low-dose [[organophosphate]] poisoning, [[Gulf War Syndrome]], pre-menstrual tension, [[irritable bowel syndrome]], and atypical chest pain. * Denial of the "known and available evidence" including omitting evidence and manipulating, misrepresenting or downplaying the facts * Systematic attempts to "deny the [[severe and very severe ME |severity]] of the symptoms, the role of external causes and the nature of the illness" * Deniers may attempt to rename or reclassify [[ME/CFS]] (for example claiming it as a modern form of an [[Neurasthenia |old (psychiatric) illness]]). * Deniers "consistently ignore existing evidence which contradicts their own preferred theories: they disregard evidence, they misconstrue findings, they distort figures and they speculate" * Using double standards for evidence in support of their own claims by using a selective choice of studies, with "research which has been shown to be flawed in the medical literature," and with a mass of generalisations, and simultaneously insisting that the opposition "provides irrefutable proof". They "down-play and attempt to overlook inconsistencies in their own research." * Challenging the expertise anyone they disagree with, that the claims of others are based only on "myth" rather than scholarship * ''Revisionists'' re-writing medical history and altering it so that it "appears to support their own claims", for example "in the psychiatric interpretation of the ME literature)" * Deniers suggest or imply that patients have formidable powers, for instance that they are able to influence certain institutions; that they get the media on their side and even that they have managed to influence the World Health Organisation. It is also alleged that patients use such tactics to misrepresent the situation to lead others astray. ===Tactics of denial that refer the character and personality of ME/CFS patients === * Portraying sufferers as abusers (victimisers) who are "targetting psychiatrists" while portray themselves as "the vulnerable and wronged group," for example refering to "vicious campaigns" organised by "pressure groups" and claiming patients are unreasonably hostile * Unsupported and unevidenced suggestions that patients are motivated by "financial or [[secondary gain]]", and that their "claims for [[Department for Work and Pensions |state benefits]] are unjustified" * Blaming patients for their illness, claiming that the problem is "not external but internal" * "Any negative characteristics of a minority of patients are typically generalised and ascribed to all ME/CFS patients, without any supportive evidence" * Minimizing or trivializing the distress and suffering of those with ME/CFS, "alleging that patients exaggerate their symptoms and suffering" ===Examples of tactics of denial === The Mental Health Movement: Persecution of Patients? gives the following examples: <blockquote> *On 25th April 2000, Dr [[Michael Sharpe]] of Edinburgh wrote a letter to Mrs Ann Crocker in which he stated “I understand your desire to have the condition classified as a Neurological Disorder (but) trying to change doctor’s (sic) behaviour by altering classification probably will not work and might even provoke a paradoxical response”. The reality is that ME is already formally classified by the World Health Organisation in the ICD as a neurological disorder, and it is Wessely School psychiatrists (not patients) who are actively trying to “alter the classification” from neurological to psychiatric. *On 18th January 2000 [[Simon Wessely]] wrote to the [[Countess of Mar]] that the “ad hominen (sic) attacks” upon him “may have the unforseen outcome of re-inforcing unhelpful stereotypes of sufferers held by some in high office”. Again, this seems to be nothing less than a threat, with the use of an [[Intimidation and bullying of PACE trial critics |intimidation technique]] made, it must never be forgotten, to very sick human beings who have been trying since Wessely came to such prominence in 1987 to redress the wrongs perpetrated upon them by these powerful medical deniers. * In the [[Joint Royal Colleges’ Report]] on CFS (see below), the authors mention a paper by Buchwald, Gallo and [[Anthony Komaroff|Komaroff]] et al (reference 128 in the Joint Report) but dismiss it, stating “White matter abnormalities occur in a number of settings and their significance remains to be determined”, whereas the paper itself concludes that patients with ME/CFS “may have been experiencing a chronic, immunologically mediated inflammatory process of the central nervous system” and that the MRI scans revealed a punctate, subcortical area of high signal intensity consistent with oedema or demyelination in 78% of cases. This is a clear illustration of the biased and misleading personal interpretation of the available evidence by Wessely School psychiatrists. * Also in the Joint Royal Colleges’ Report, the authors mention a paper by Bombadier and Buchwald (reference 173 in the Report) and convey that this paper supports their own stance, whereas the paper itself actually contradicts the Joint Report and clearly states “The fact that the same prognostic indicators were not valid for the group with CFS challenges the assumption that previous outcome research on chronic fatigue is generalizable to patients with [[chronic fatigue syndrome]]”. * Another illustration is found in the Joint Royal Colleges’ Report: the authors rely on a paper by Sandman et al (reference 163 in the Joint Report) in apparent support of their own view that the results of neuropsychological testing have been inconsistent, but the paper in fact concludes “the performance of the CFIDS patients was sevenfold worse than either the control or the depressed group. These results indicated that the memory deficit in CFIDS was more severe than assumed by the CDC criteria. A pattern emerged of brain behaviour relationships supporting neurological compromise in (ME)CFS”. One would never know this from the way the authors of the Joint Royal Colleges’ Report deliberately downplayed, misrepresented and manipulated the references which they cited in supposed support of their own views.</blockquote> ===Consequences of tactics of denial=== Professor Hooper states: <blockquote>"Such is the profundity of articles, reports and research papers produced by this group of psychiatrists that there is now a widespread belief that ME/CFS is not a disorder which requires money to be spent on specialist tests or on expensive virological or immunological research, let alone on long-term sickness benefits."</blockquote>
Summary:
Please make sure your edits are consistent with
MEpedia's guidelines
.
By saving changes, you agree to the
Terms of use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 3.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:
Category:All articles with unsourced statements
Category:Articles with unsourced statements from unknown year
Navigation
Navigation
Skip to content
Main page
Browse
Become an editor
Random page
Popular pages
Abbreviations
Glossary
About MEpedia
Links for editors
Contents
Guidelines
Recent changes
Pages in need
Search
Help
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs