Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Search
Editing
Overtraining syndrome
(section)
From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Learn more == * [https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/dspace-jspui/bitstream/2134/17104/1/ECSS-ACSM%20Overtraining%20consensus%20ACCEPTED.pdf Joint College's Statement (2012)] * [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Wayne_Derman/publication/304013746_The_Differential_Diagnosis_and_Clinical_Approach_to_the_Athlete_With_Chronic_Fatigue/links/5762fb7e08aecb4f6fee0463/The-Differential-Diagnosis-and-Clinical-Approach-to-the-Athlete-With-Chronic-Fatigue.pdf The Differential Diagnosis and Clinical Approach to the Athlete With Chronic Fatigue] * [http://theargusreport.com/us-nih-report-calls-uk-definition-mecfs-scrapped/ US NIH Report Calls for UK Definition of ME/CFS to be Scrapped]<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=http://theargusreport.com/us-nih-report-calls-uk-definition-mecfs-scrapped/| title = US NIH Report Calls for UK Definition of ME/CFS to be Scrapped | last = Swift | first = Penny | date = 2015-01-16 | website = The Argus Report|language=en-US|access-date=2019-02-28}}</ref> ([[Oxford criteria]]) <blockquote>The [[United States]] [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH) has issued a draft report that highlights the dire need for scientific research that will help find a cure for the millions of people suffering from [[ME/CFS|myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome]] (ME/CFS) worldwide. The report also highlights the fact that the decades-old [[United Kingdom|UK]] [[Oxford criteria]] for [[ME/CFS]] are severely “flawed,” and that continuing to use these criteria may “cause harm.” Further, the [[National Institutes of Health|NIH]] report says that the Royal Society definition should “be retired” and replaced with a single case definition agreed to by the ME/CFS community.<ref name=":0" /></blockquote>
Summary:
Please make sure your edits are consistent with
MEpedia's guidelines
.
By saving changes, you agree to the
Terms of use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 3.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:
Category:All articles with unsourced statements
Category:Articles with unsourced statements from 2021
Navigation
Navigation
Skip to content
Main page
Browse
Become an editor
Random page
Popular pages
Abbreviations
Glossary
About MEpedia
Links for editors
Contents
Guidelines
Recent changes
Pages in need
Search
Help
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs