Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Search
Editing
HPV vaccine
(section)
From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Controversy == * [https://www.webmd.com/children/vaccines/features/should-your-child-get-hpv-vaccine#1 Should Your Child Get the HPV Vaccine?]<ref>{{Cite news | url=https://www.webmd.com/children/vaccines/features/should-your-child-get-hpv-vaccine#1 | title = Should Your Child Get the HPV Vaccine? | last = Edgar | first = Julie | date = |work=WebMD|access-date=2018-11-29|archive-url=|archive-date=|url-status=|language=en-US|quote=}}</ref> * 2012, [https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/hpv-vaccine-controversy/2012-01 The HPV Vaccine Controversy]<ref name="Intlekofer2012">{{Cite journal | last = Intlekofer | first = Karlie A. | last2 = Cunningham | first2 = Michael J. | last3 = Caplan | first3 = Arthur L. | date = 2012-01-01 | title = The HPV Vaccine Controversy| url = https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/hpv-vaccine-controversy/2012-01|journal=AMA Journal of Ethics|volume=14|issue=1|doi=|issn=2376-6980 | pages = |quote=|via=}}</ref> * 2014, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708146/ Pros, cons, and ethics of HPV vaccine in teens—Why such controversy?]<ref name="PMC4708146">{{Cite journal | last = White | first = Mark Donald | authorlink = | date = 2014 | title=Pros, cons, and ethics of HPV vaccine in teens—Why such controversy?| url = https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4708146/|journal=Translational Andrology and Urology|volume=3|issue=4 | pages = 429–434|doi=10.3978/j.issn.2223-4683.2014.11.02|issn=2223-4691|pmc=4708146|pmid=26816799|quote=|via=}}</ref> *Gøtzsche et al. (2021) criticized the European Medicines Agency report on HPV vaccine safety for being overly confident and relying too heavily on data on serious adverse events reported by the manufacturers during clinical trials, and also made criticisms of the Cochrane review process. They referred to previous investigations into rates of raised particular concerns about rates of POTS, ME/CFS and Chronic Regional Pain Syndrome (CRPS) after HPV vaccination, and to rates of post-vaccination in POTS compared to POTS rates after other vaccines. However, Gøtzsche et al avoided stating that the HPV vaccines were not safe and they present any analysis of data, or draw their own conclusions about the HPV vaccines.<ref name="Gotzscheletter2021" />
Summary:
Please make sure your edits are consistent with
MEpedia's guidelines
.
By saving changes, you agree to the
Terms of use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 3.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation
Navigation
Skip to content
Main page
Browse
Become an editor
Random page
Popular pages
Abbreviations
Glossary
About MEpedia
Links for editors
Contents
Guidelines
Recent changes
Pages in need
Search
Help
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs