Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Search
Editing
Gupta program
(section)
From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit
Edit source
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==Notable studies == *2020, Mindfulness-Based Program Plus Amygdala and Insula Retraining (MAIR) for the Treatment of Women with Fibro<ref name="MAIR2020">{{Cite journal | title = Mindfulness-Based Program Plus Amygdala and Insula Retraining (MAIR) for the Treatment of Women with Fibromyalgia: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial | date = Oct 2020| url = https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3246/htm|journal=Journal of Clinical Medicine|volume=9|issue=10 | pages = 3246 | last = Sanabria-Mazo | first = Juan P. | authorlink = | last2 = Montero-Marin | first2 = Jesus | authorlink2 = | last3 = Feliu-Soler | first3 = Albert | authorlink3 = | last4 = Gasión | first4 = Virginia | authorlink4 = | last5 = Navarro-Gil | first5 = Mayte | authorlink5 = | last6 = Morillo-Sarto | first6 = Héctor | authorlink6 = | last7 = Colomer-Carbonell | first7 = Ariadna | last8 = Borràs | first8 = Xavier | last9 = Tops | first9 = Mattie | last10 = Luciano | first10 = Juan V. | last11 = García-Campayo | first11 = Javier|language=en|doi=10.3390/jcm9103246|pmc=PMC7599726|pmid=33050630|access-date=|issn=2077-0383|quote=|via=}}</ref> - [https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/9/10/3246/htm (Full text)] ::'''Conflict of interest not declared:''' Author and investigator Virginia Gasión (Virginia Gasión Royo) had been a Gupta coach since 2014, which means she earns from people doing the Gupta Program, giving a direct final financial conflict of interest.<ref name="Guptacoaches">{{Cite web | url=https://www.guptaprogram.com/coaches | title = Our Professional Team of Coaches | last = | first = | authorlink = | date = | website = Gupta Program|language=en-US|archive-url=|archive-date=|url-status=|access-date=2022-06-03}}</ref> *2012, A mind-body technique for symptoms related to fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue<ref name="Toussaint2012">{{Cite journal | title = A mind-body technique for symptoms related to fibromyalgia and chronic fatigue | date = Mar 2012| url = https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22385563/|journal=Explore (New York, N.Y.)|volume=8|issue=2 | pages = 92–98 | last = Toussaint | first = Loren L. | authorlink = Loren Toussaint | last2 = Whipple | first2 = Mary O. | authorlink2 = | last3 = Abboud | first3 = Lana L. | authorlink3 = | last4 = Vincent | first4 = Ann | authorlink4 = Ann Vincent | last5 = Wahner-Roedler | first5 = Dietlind L.|doi=10.1016/j.explore.2011.12.003|pmc=|pmid=22385563|access-date=|issn=1878-7541|quote=|via=}}</ref> - [https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Loren-Toussaint/publication/229324365_A_Mind-Body_Technique_for_Symptoms_Related_to_Fibromyalgia_and_Chronic_Fatigue/links/59e3bb3f458515393d5b935f/A-Mind-Body-Technique-for-Symptoms-Related-to-Fibromyalgia-and-Chronic-Fatigue.pdf (Full text)] ::The [[Advertising Standards Authority]] rejected this as evidence of effectiveness of the Gupta Program.<ref name="ASA2018" /> ::This was open to patients with [[chronic fatigue syndrome]] but none completed it. Of the 32 patients randomly assigned to Amygdala and Insula Retraining (AIR) plus standard care, 19% (6 patients) dropped out before starting, 19% (6 patients) did not complete baseline measures but did AIR, 41% (13 patients) did AIR but not the follow-up assessments, 22% (7 patients) did AIR and completed follow-up assessments. Twice as many patients completed standard care, including both assessments - 56% (14 out of 25).<ref name="Toussaint2012" /> ===Articles not peer reviewed or from non-academic journals=== *2010, Can amygdala retraining techniques improve the wellbeing of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome? A clinical audit of subjective outcomes in a small sample<ref name="GuptaAudit">{{Cite journal |archive-url = http://web.archive.org/web/20111119095503/http://www.guptaprogramme.com/Amygdala_Retraining_JHH_Sept_2010.pdf |archive-date=2011-11-11 | url = https://www.guptaprogram.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/amygdala-retraining-jhh-sept-2010.pdf | last = Gupta | first = A | authorlink = Ashok Gupta | date =September 2010 | title = Can amygdala retraining techniques improve the wellbeing of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome? A clinical audit of subjective outcomes in a small sample. |journal = Journal of Holistic Healthcare |volume= 7 |issue =2 | pages = 12-15 |access-date=2022-06-02}}</ref> - [http://web.archive.org/web/20111119095503/http://www.guptaprogramme.com/Amygdala_Retraining_JHH_Sept_2010.pdf (Full text)] ::The Advertising Standards Authority rejected this as evidence of effectiveness of the Gupta Program.<ref name="ASA2018" /> ::This was not published in an academic journal<ref name="JHH">{{Cite web | url=https://bhma.org/journal-information-for-contributors/ | title = Journal - information for contributors | last = | first = | authorlink = | date = | website = British Holistic Medical Association|archive-url=|archive-date=|url-status=|access-date=2022-06-03}}</ref> *2002, Unconscious amygdalar fear conditioning in a subset of chronic fatigue syndrome patients<ref name="Gupta2002">{{Cite journal | last = Gupta | first = Ashok | authorlink = Ashok Gupta | date = 2002 | title = Unconscious amygdalar fear conditioning in a subset of chronic fatigue syndrome patients| url = https://www.guptaprogram.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/cfs-hypothesis-medical-hypotheses-article.pdf | journal=Medical Hypotheses|volume=59|issue=6 | pages = 727–735|quote=|via=}}</ref> - [https://www.guptaprogram.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/cfs-hypothesis-medical-hypotheses-article.pdf (Full text)] ::The ''Medical Hypotheses'' journal that published this is reported to be the world's most controversial journal,<ref name="MHcontroversial">{{Cite journal | title = Editor says no to peer review for controversial journal | date = 2010-03-18| url = https://www.nature.com/articles/news.2010.132|journal=Nature | last = Cressey | first = Daniel|language=en|doi=10.1038/news.2010.132|issn=1476-4687}}</ref> and describes itself as publishing hypothesis that are "radical, speculative and non-mainstream scientific ideas" and some "where experimental support is yet fragmentary".<ref name="MH">{{Cite web | url=https://www.elsevier.com/journals/medical-hypotheses/0306-9877/guide-for-authors | title = Guide for authors - Medical Hypotheses - ISSN 0306-9877 | last = | first = | authorlink = | date = | website = Elsevier|language=en|archive-url=|archive-date=|url-status=|access-date=2022-06-03}}</ref><ref name="MH-SS">{{Cite web | url=https://www.sciencedirect.com/journal/medical-hypotheses | title = Medical Hypotheses {{!}} Journal | last = | first = | authorlink = | date = | website = ScienceDirect.com by Elsevier|language=en-us|archive-url=|archive-date=|url-status=|access-date=2022-06-03}}</ref> It is peer-reviewed.
Summary:
Please make sure your edits are consistent with
MEpedia's guidelines
.
By saving changes, you agree to the
Terms of use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 3.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
This page is a member of 2 hidden categories:
Category:All articles with unsourced statements
Category:Articles with unsourced statements from 2022
Navigation
Navigation
Skip to content
Main page
Browse
Become an editor
Random page
Popular pages
Abbreviations
Glossary
About MEpedia
Links for editors
Contents
Guidelines
Recent changes
Pages in need
Search
Help
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs