Category talk:People with ME, CFS, and/or FMS

I think a separate category needs to be made for historical figures who had illnesses that we surmise may have been ME/CFS. It's possible they had other illnesses but the tests and criteria for such illnesses didn't exist yet. An excellent example of this possible misdiagnosing is with Charles Darwin, where on his bio page other differential diagnoses are listed.

I can't think of a succinct phase, but something along the lines of:

People with ME, CFS, and/or FMS (unconfirmed)

Kmdenmark (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2018 (PDT)

___________

How about: "People probably with ME, CFS, and/or FMS"? I can't think of anything shorter. "purportedly" leans towards no. But either way having the category is a YES, we can always tweak the name later. Ollie (talk) 05:56, 25 May 2018 (PDT)

________________

The more I think about it, I like using "unconfirmed." "Unconfirmed' is a term used in medical diagnosis, so it sounds professional. If a patient comes in with chest pain, and the doctor wants to rule out heart attack, the primary diagnosis is "chest pain" and the secondary diagnosis is "myocardial infarction (unconfirmed)" until the tests come back. In the US, one can even bill for a unconfirmed diagnosis. I'm leaning towards either:
 * People with ME, CFS, and/or FMS (unconfirmed)
 * People with ME, CFS, and/or FMS (unconfirmed diagnosis)

Kmdenmark (talk) 06:53, 25 May 2018 (PDT)

Split please -- Guido den Broeder (talk) 20:33, September 2, 2019 (EDT)
Can we please split this category into smaller, homogenous groups? I am not someone with 'ME, CFS, and/or FMS'. That would suggests my diagnosis is unknown. It is though, I am someone with ME. Thanks, Guido den Broeder (talk) 20:33, September 2, 2019 (EDT)