Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Search
Editing
Talk:Peter White
(section)
From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit source
New topic
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
==funding for Cochrane meeting == The original version also said that "Prof White also funded and was involved in the Cochrane review of GET." I suspect this mixed up (1) the Cochrane review and (2) the protocol for a review of the individual patient data, which was cancelled. The (1) actual Cochrane review says: "We would like to thank Peter White and Paul Glasziou for advice and additional information provided." But all main authors of the GET-trials are thanked. Are there sources that indicate he helped fund this review? In (2) the protocol, White was mentioned as an author and thanked because his academic fund financed the third meeting. But there were two other meeting, one funded by Hege R Eriksen and one by Paul Glasziou. Is this sufficient to mention on the page? - Sisyphus [[User:Notjusttired]] :I believe the funding comment is a mistake. I have not heard it mentioned anywhere and have read both Cochrane exercise therapy and CBT reviews in full on the past. It's possible that White received a small amount from Cochrane for his spent answering their questions. It is significant that they are credited in the review since they provided input beyond their actual data to the reviewers, although of course it should mention that others who did trials were also credited and that they did not perform the analysis for Cochrane. The full Cochrane report is still online and describes their role will. One thing especially significant is that they shared data here, but refused to share data to the general public, to James Coyne or Keith Geraghty - an argument brought up in the information commissioner's tribunal - White's university - Queen Mary University of London - held the PACE trial data and spent Β£250,000 trying to avoid releasing it. Also significant to Cochrane is the fact the exercise therapy review was carried out by a Common Mental Disorders team. (I am not 100% sure but either this review or the CBT one was carried out by Jonathan R Price - colleague of PACE author Michael Sharpe. I suspect that was the CBT one though. The [[Cochrane collaboration]] and [[Robert Courtney]] pages might have more on this.) [[User:Notjusttired|notjusttired]] ([[User talk:Notjusttired|talk]]) 22:16, August 21, 2019 (EDT)
Summary:
Please make sure your edits are consistent with
MEpedia's guidelines
.
By saving changes, you agree to the
Terms of use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 3.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation
Navigation
Skip to content
Main page
Browse
Become an editor
Random page
Popular pages
Abbreviations
Glossary
About MEpedia
Links for editors
Contents
Guidelines
Recent changes
Pages in need
Search
Help
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs