Anonymous
Not logged in
Talk
Contributions
Create account
Log in
Search
Editing
Talk:ME/CFS
(section)
From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history
Namespaces
Page
Discussion
More
More
Page actions
Read
Edit source
New topic
History
Warning:
You are not logged in. Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits. If you
log in
or
create an account
, your edits will be attributed to your username, along with other benefits.
Anti-spam check. Do
not
fill this in!
== Criteria comparison == *2016, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556426/pdf/nihms699325.pdf ''Chronic Fatigue Syndrome versus Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease'' (Pg. 13 Table 1)], shows out of 795 participants, the following percentages of patients met different criteria: :From ''CFS vs SEID'', Pg. 13<ref>[https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4556426/pdf/nihms699325.pdf Chronic Fatigue Syndrome versus Systemic Exertion Intolerance Disease, HHS Public Access]</ref> :::::Table 1 :::::88% [[SEID]] - (Developed by the IOM report) [[PEM]] Required :::::92% [[Fukuda criteria]] - (CFS) (Used by committee that developed IOM report) PEM Optional :::::76% [[CCC]] - (ME/CFS) (Used by committee that developed the IOM report) PEM Optional :::::61% [[Four-symptom criteria]] - (ME/CFS) PEM Required :::::60% [[ICC]] - (ME) PEM Required There are fewer ME-ICC patients and the numbers of afflicted and financial impact from the IOM report are not correctly attributed to ME or CFS but instead to ME/CFS as Fukuda criteria and CCC were used by the authors of the IOM report.<ref name="IOM2015MECFS"/> *2017, [http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/21641846.2017.1299079?journalCode=rftg20& ''Patients diagnosed with Myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome also fit systemic exertion intolerance disease criteria''], results and conclusion: :''Excerpt'' :'''Results:''' At 6 months of illness, SEID criteria identified 72% of all subjects, similar to when Fukuda criteria (79%) or the CCC (71%) were used, whereas the ME-ICC selected for a significantly lower percentage (61%, pβ<β.001). When severity/frequency thresholds were added to the Fukuda criteria, CCC and ME-ICC, the percentage of these subjects also fitting SEID criteria increased to 93%, 97%, and 95%. Eighty-seven percent of SEID subjects endorsed [[cognitive impairment]] and 92%, [[OI]]; 79% experienced both symptoms. :'''Conclusions:''' SEID criteria categorize a similar percentage of subjects as Fukuda criteria early in the course of ME/CFS and contain the majority of subjects identified using other criteria while requiring fewer symptoms. The advantage of SEID may be in its ease of use. When Fukuda criteria, CCC and ME-ICC have severity/frequency thresholds added patients will meet SEID criteria. This is advantageous in a clinical setting as patients can be diagnosed by a Primary/GP/Family Doctor using SEID and then the patient can go through the process of receiving a CFS, ME/CFS or ME diagnosis from a doctor/researcher using Fukuda, CCC or ME-ICC until a [[Biomarker]] is found.
Summary:
Please make sure your edits are consistent with
MEpedia's guidelines
.
By saving changes, you agree to the
Terms of use
, and you irrevocably agree to release your contribution under the
CC BY-SA 3.0 License
and the
GFDL
. You agree that a hyperlink or URL is sufficient attribution under the Creative Commons license.
Cancel
Editing help
(opens in new window)
Navigation
Navigation
Skip to content
Main page
Browse
Become an editor
Random page
Popular pages
Abbreviations
Glossary
About MEpedia
Links for editors
Contents
Guidelines
Recent changes
Pages in need
Search
Help
Wiki tools
Wiki tools
Special pages
Page tools
Page tools
User page tools
More
What links here
Related changes
Page information
Page logs