International Alliance for M.E.

From MEpedia, a crowd-sourced encyclopedia of ME and CFS science and history

International Alliance for M.E. or IAFME is a collective comprised of advocacy and patient groups throughout the world. The group was launched in 2018 by Action for ME, a UK advocacy group.[1] IAFME aims to lead a coordinated and appropriate public health response to Myalgic encephalomyelitis from the World Health Organisation (WHO), a specialized agency of the United Nations which is headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland.

Origin[edit | edit source]

The initiative for IAFME was taken by the British patient organization Action for ME in 2016. Through international advocacy and collaboration the aim is to get ME on the international policy agenda and to raise awareness at the highest political level. One of the main targets is the adoption of a World Health Assembly (WHA) resolution that recognizes ME as a chronic debilitating disease and calls for accelerated biomedical research into ME. The executive director of IAFME, Alexandra Heumber, has previously led the advocacy for the adoption of the Mycetoma (a neglected inflammatory disease) WHA resolution.[2]

Members[edit | edit source]

IAFME is comprised of may different patient organisations from multiple countries.  It includes Emerge Australia, Japan ME Association, ME CFS Foundation South Africa, The American ME and CFS Society, United States, Forward-ME (a collective of British ME organizations led by the Countess of Mar) and two Spanish organizations: Sensibilització Central and Plataforma Familiars Fm-SFC-SQM.  The actions and letters of IAFME are supported by many more ME patient organizations and advocates.[3]

Projects[edit | edit source]

9 November 2016: protesting the Edward Shorter lecture[edit | edit source]

On 9 November 2016 the ME/CFS International Alliance, a predecessor of IAFME, published a protest letter against the planned lecture of historian Edward Shorter at the National Institutes of Health.[4] The letter listed ME/CFS advocates such as Carol Head and Jennifer Brea as "current members of the International Alliance", even though these persons did not gave formal consent to joining or supporting a new organisation.[5] ME patients were suspicious of the International Alliance as very little information was given about the organisation except for what appeared on the website of Action for ME, the UK charity that was behind the initiative. Nothing was heard about International Alliance until the existence of IAFME was announced one and a half years later.[6]

12 May 2018: MillionsMissing at Geneva[edit | edit source]

On 12 May 2018, IAFME organized a MillionsMissing event in front of WHO headquarters, Geneva, Switzerland. A letter was send to Dr Tedros Ghebreyesus of the WHO calling for urgent action action to address M.E. globally. IAFME asked the WHO to recognize ME as a chronic multisystem disease and to “support accelerated biomedical research to develop better diagnostic methods and treatments for M.E.[3]

4 December 2018: the trans-national consensus document[edit | edit source]

On 4 December, 2018 IAFME produced a trans-national consensus document called “Recognition, research and respect: An agenda for change in ME”. It was supported by  over 60 clinicians, researchers, and non-governmental organisations from 28 different countries. The signees include BACME, the UK CFS/ME Research Collaborative and EUROMENE. The consensus document had three aims: 1) To provide an overview of M.E. and the disease burden, 2) To highlight barriers to progressing research in the M.E. field, 3) To propose an agenda for change.[7]

The document demands that definitions of ME include the hallmark symptom of the disease, post-exertional malaise, and to retire the broad Oxford and Fukuda criteria. The text reads: “Treatments, such as CBT and GET, tested using the criteria which does not require post-exertional malaise, should not be recommended for people with ME.” The document states that disease experts do not recommend GET or CBT but instead that patients manage their activities to stay within their “energy envelope” to prevent crashes. The IAFME also highlights another problem in ME-research, namely the lack of sick controls to show that changes are unique to ME rather than generic ill-health markers.

The IAFME document has been applauded by ME advocates such as Mary Dimmock[8] but criticized by others. Ellen Goudsmit argued that it is too focused on the literature of proponents of cognitive behavioral therapy and doesn’t include adequate information about pacing.[9] Referencing the multiple ME outbreaks, Jerrold Spinhirne argued that it is incorrect for the document to call ME a non-communicable disease.[10]

Funding[edit | edit source]

Interviews and articles[edit | edit source]

Online presence[edit | edit source]

See also[edit | edit source]

Learn more[edit | edit source]

References[edit | edit source]